Uhhh...MORE than a few IASCA World Champions have used the Kickers. Like Jim said, in the right hands, anything is possible.i am willing to accept that i am wrong about the following: but i've never seen L7's take first in an SQ comp. if they have please show me where
ya cotjones sucks at life lolHere is another thread with this guy bullshitting about stuff he doesn't have a clue about. http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?p=2853837#post2853837
exactlySeriously though, u cant lower your impedance due to the way that u make a box or the materials that are used
i allready know these things that no-one knows how to say without insult, and some of you don't even answer, you only insult... your just makeing yourselves look more pathetic, infact not only do i know what the problem is (which this thread did not help me with....) but i fixed it... this is another example of people not careing about audio and just talking trash, seriously get a life i post to have questions answered... not hear people that don't know me and spend their lives slaving to the internet all day tell ME that I **** at life...exactly
you cant go lower then ur DCR resistance with ur givin wiring options.....imp rise goes up, not down buddy.
jl is good stuff, however for the money u pay you might as well surgicaly remove a testicle and and use that as payment too. JL sounds nice but isnt geared towards spl at all.
some of the things youve been quoted saying make absolutly no sense whatsoever, and are entirely noobish in many ways. but hey we were all noobs aqt some point in time, some just say more stupid shit than others....
your comment about wishing they made circular cones again made me lol so hard i almost shit myself....
not lower than DCR? not the issue, in fact in a subwoofer inductance is generally responsible for about 20-40% of total nominal impedance... that leaves DCR (voice coil resistance including lead wires and terminals) to 60 to 80% how does that effect the sub? if i went by the DCR, my systems nominal impedance would be .4 considering the dcr for 1 10w6v2 in series is 6.3, and in parallel 1.575... since i don't know the speakers inductance and IEC's standards state that the true nominal impedance may drop to 80% of what rated nominal impedance, i think it was pretty safe to say (without knowing wat inductance is) that impedance for that 4 speaker load could've very well been dropping below the "rated" 2 ohm load.exactlyyou can't go lower then ur DCR resistance with ur givin wiring options.....imp rise goes up, not down buddy.
excuse me, what?!?! i've bought 5 of their w6's and one of their most expensive amps. I've heard (or seen due to volume) setups of dd's that have won SQ comps and kickers that have won SPL levels like 170db's and i am thrilled with my JL, and the price i paid for them, further more i have both of my testicals and they are functioning perfectly...jl is good stuff, however for the money u pay you might as well surgicaly remove a testicle and and use that as payment too. JL sounds nice but isnt geared towards spl at all.
ok whoever thought up the trend of the word noob should be shot... esspecially because it is used so often to describe people that you do not know and could very well have more knowledge about you if not in some areas but not all... i am positive everyone on here knows more about something or many things than me, but i am also positive that i know more about certain issues than otherssome of the things youve been quoted saying make absolutly no sense whatsoever, and are entirely noobish in many ways. but hey we were all noobs aqt some point in time, some just say more stupid shit than others....
u might wanna see a doc. but the current circle cone subs they make are almost the square version with a circle cone, i might be mistaken but i believe it is the exact same motor, even if it isn't it's close... furthermore their "flagship" the solox is square and there is no round version of it, but the solox itself was round in the past i think they spelled it different, like solex... reguardless kicker has changed its focus to the square subs and mainly keeps the circles for people who won't change their setups to accomodate a square, it even says that on their website....your comment about wishing they made circular cones again made me lol so hard i almost shit myself....
Ok, stop. You're way off here. You may have read a quick article somewhere about the difference between DCR and nominal impedance but your understanding of this is just not correct. I'm not going to bash you here and I really do want you to learn this so that you will not confuse people who, like yourself, don't truly understand the idea of resistance and impedance.not lower than DCR? not the issue, in fact in a subwoofer inductance is generally responsible for about 20-40% of total nominal impedance... that leaves DCR (voice coil resistance including lead wires and terminals) to 60 to 80% how does that effect the sub? if i went by the DCR, my systems nominal impedance would be .4 considering the dcr for 1 10w6v2 in parrallel is 6.3, and in series 1.575... since i don't know the speakers inductance and IEC's standards state that the true nominal impedance may drop to 80% of what rated nominal impedance, i think it was pretty safe to say (without knowing wat inductance is) that impedance for that 4 speaker load could've very well been dropping below the "rated" 2 ohm load.
you just told me what i said was wrong, and then said exacly what i said.... i didn't mean that i don't know what inductance means... i said i don't know what the inductance of the subs is... besides that you cannot drop to your DC resistance unless your inductance is ZERO and then your speaker wouldn't be doin much, so the fact that that dc resistance is what your impedance can drop to is flat wrong... i KNOW this much to be true or at least erroneous... because the sum of the inductance and the resistance is not equal to the DCR value as you said it is... in fact the DCR is the resistance... so DCR+inductance= nominal impedance which IS the "supposed" lowest impedance of the sub... also that "imaginary number in the inductance is simply a algebraic formula used to avoid the value becomeing 0 because it is impossible for the inductance to become ZERO... so yes techically nominal impedance is definded as....Ok, stop. You're way off here. You may have read a quick article somewhere about the difference between DCR and nominal impedance but your understanding of this is just not correct. I'm not going to bash you here and I really do want you to learn this so that you will not confuse people who, like yourself, don't truly understand the idea of resistance and impedance.
The first thing we need to get straight is parallel and series connections. In very basic terms, when you connect resistive elements in series, the total resistance ALWAYS increases. When you connect resistive elements in parallel the total resistance ALWAYS decreases. Your w6s have a DCR value of 3.15 ohms. Elements in series are additive. This means the series wiring will lead to a DC resistance of 6.3 ohms (3.15 + 3.15). When you wire them in parallel, you get 1.575 ohms ([1/3.15 + 1/3.15]^-1). With 4 DVC subs, you have the wiring options of either 1.575, .394, or 6.3 (note all of these are DCR values and not nominal impedance).
You say that you don't know what inductance is and I'll give a small explanation of it. Inductance is a measurement of how strong a magnetic field is, per unit area, (also known as magnetic flux) with the current you're passing through the unit. In a DC environment, your current is constant (hence the Direct Current) and thus the part of the voice coil that is acting like an inductor is now acting like a short (think of the resistance and inductance of the sub as if they're in series with each other). If the inductance is a short, you can say that its value of resistance is 0. If you now take the resistance of the coil, the sum of the inductance and resistance is going to be equal it its DCR value. Now, when we use an AC (Alternating Current) source, we create a magnetic field and get flux. With this flux, we're going to have inductance added to the DCR. Since this voice coil is one unit, the values are as if they are in series. Like I said earlier, series components do NOT ever lower in value. So we now have the inductance (which will vary over frequency) added with the DC resistance of the coil. This value, over the usable range of the sub while free-air will be roughly 2 ohms per voice coil. The resistance of the wire running to the sub is in SERIES with the voice coil so all that resistance (a very small amount) will also be ADDED to the impedance. Oh, impedance is the measurement of resistance with a real (DC resistance) and imaginary (resistance caused by capacitance or inductance) component. Also, by imaginary, this does not mean it doesn't exist but rather that its values are described with the mathematical value of "i" or the √(-1). It's common to see the impedance of an object described as 2+0.5i (where 2 is the real or DCR component and 0.5 is the imaginary component). You could also see this value in terms of 2.06 with phase angle of 14*.
So after reading all that, hopefully you will see that your subs should not drop below the value of it's DC resistance (your subs are rated at 3.15 ohms per voice coil). You should have wired your subs to the 1.5ohm DCR load, which could be done by wiring each sub with its coils in series and then each sub in parallel with each other. If you did this correctly, your amp will only see a load higher than 1.575ohms, which your amp should be stable at 1.5 ohms.
I hope this clears some stuff up.
Like that.a general easier rule of thumb is take your DCR and muliply it by 1.3 to get NOM. Impedance
i don't know what you are talking about i said even if i don't know anything else, I DO know this... and that is true its not allways accurate but generally it's close to mulitiply DCR by 1.3 because inductance is usually from 20 to 40 percent of the DCR so yeah... what is your problem with this statement?You always give the "I don't claim to know" line, yet you spout off things like you do.
Like that.