I'm going to miss George W. Bush

i don't disagree with this. for instance, i don't feel sorry for GM or chrysler. they had plenty of time to get their stuff together and compete with the imports. they didn't. ties with government, ties with oil, union bullcrap, CEOs and their outrageous salaries. i wouldn't feel bad for them if they fail. the ones i feel bad for are the average joes. if the big 3 go under, more people will lose their jobs, their homes, their lifestyles, thus magnifying the economic crisis.
this i agree with .

 
Continued deleverging in the economy until we get back to fundamental values. (not a moral/religious term, an economic one). The money we make per hour will decrease, the things we buy will decrease, but it will be real and sustainable without the proliferation of obscene amount of credit. It will be an economy will risk and reward actually work, not one where you take big risks and leave the company in shambles when they don't pan out.
Getting my money back? Are you a stupid fvck? If you take a dollar from me and give me my dollar back tomorrow, I am not getting my money back. I must be compensated for my lost purchasing power during the interim. Time Value of Money ring a bell??? I hope you don't proclaim to be educated. If you are, that English degree is going to get you took in the real world.
what the hell is deleverging? i hope YOU weren't an english major. read the passage in bold and apply it to yourself. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 
i don't disagree with this. for instance, i don't feel sorry for GM or chrysler. they had plenty of time to get their stuff together and compete with the imports. they didn't. ties with government, ties with oil, union bullcrap, CEOs and their outrageous salaries. i wouldn't feel bad for them if they fail. the ones i feel bad for are the average joes. if the big 3 go under, more people will lose their jobs, their homes, their lifestyles, thus magnifying the economic crisis.
This is what I take issue with. It is not the business of the government to perpetuate a lifestyle of two car garage, two cars in the garage, a brick house, and a dog. The government should assist in your survival...meaning not starving to death in the streets...anything above and beyond that is on the individual.

 
This is what I take issue with. It is not the business of the government to perpetuate a lifestyle of two car garage, two cars in the garage, a brick house, and a home. The government should assist in your survival...meaning not starving to death in the streets...anything above and beyond that is on the individual.
Kinda like... limited government?

 
This is what I take issue with. It is not the business of the government to perpetuate a lifestyle of two car garage, two cars in the garage, a brick house, and a dog. The government should assist in your survival...meaning not starving to death in the streets...anything above and beyond that is on the individual.
no, i agree with that. but why are you assuming that's the kind of lifestyle that all of these working people try to maintain? how about those that work these jobs that are barely scraping by, using everything they have each month, trying to take care of their families?

 
what the hell is deleverging? i hope YOU weren't an english major. read the passage in bold and apply it to yourself. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
Deleveraging....sorry left out the "a".

It is the unwinding of credit. Instead of lending or borrowing, one grows at a natural rate.

 
what the hell is deleverging? i hope YOU weren't an english major. read the passage in bold and apply it to yourself. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&newwindow=1&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:eek:fficial&hs=rzm&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=1&ct=result&cd=1&q=deleveraging&spell=1

you should learn to use google before you make yourself look ignorant. he was one letter off but google still knew what it was. MORON

 
i don't disagree with this. for instance, i don't feel sorry for GM or chrysler. they had plenty of time to get their stuff together and compete with the imports. they didn't. ties with government, ties with oil, union bullcrap, CEOs and their outrageous salaries. i wouldn't feel bad for them if they fail. the ones i feel bad for are the average joes. if the big 3 go under, more people will lose their jobs, their homes, their lifestyles, thus magnifying the economic crisis.
I agree but it will be a lot harder over the long haul to try nursing them back to workable business than it would to just make them restructure. Short term will hurt but in the long run the recovery would be much better and faster.

 
no, i agree with that. but why are you assuming that's the kind of lifestyle that all of these working people try to maintain? how about those that work these jobs that are barely scraping by, using everything they have each month, trying to take care of their families?
Then they are barely scraping by...they are surviving and living. It is not the responsibility of government to provide them with more than that, and the opportunity to grow.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

jmanpc

5,000+ posts
CA.com Nostalgist.
Thread starter
jmanpc
Joined
Location
Jacksonville, Fl
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
100
Views
1,806
Last reply date
Last reply from
pilotbear
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top