I need help awnswring this question?

[NoobieAudio 10+ year member]

it was tip....

 

[NoobieAudio 10+ year member]

I see your edit. Yes I did not explain the $9 amount. It wasn't needed to explain where 'the other dollar' went in my scenario. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

yep //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif wanna laugh full heartedly like santa claus @ all the morons?

 

[528hz 10+ year member]

Look you geniouseseesesee....let me enlighten you all...

(STOLEN FROM WIKI)

The invisible hand is a metaphor coined by the economist Adam Smith. In The Wealth of Nations and other writings, Smith demonstrated that, in a free market, an individual pursuing his own self-interest tends to also promote the good of his community as a whole through a principle that he called “the invisible hand”. He argued that each individual maximizing revenue for himself maximizes the total revenue of society as a whole, as this is identical with the sum total of individual revenues.

In this case the bell hop boy is the one pursuing his "own self interest" but so are the guys that are staying in the room. The "society" is the hotel or cash register. The "sum total of individual revenues" is the mysterious $29.

PWND!!!!!!

 

[NoobieAudio 10+ year member]

Look you geniouseseesesee....let me enlighten you all...
(STOLEN FROM WIKI)

The invisible hand is a metaphor coined by the economist Adam Smith. In The Wealth of Nations and other writings, Smith demonstrated that, in a free market, an individual pursuing his own self-interest tends to also promote the good of his community as a whole through a principle that he called “the invisible hand”. He argued that each individual maximizing revenue for himself maximizes the total revenue of society as a whole, as this is identical with the sum total of individual revenues.

In this case the bell hop boy is the one pursuing his "own self interest" but so are the guys that are staying in the room. The "society" is the hotel or cash register. The "sum total of individual revenues" is the mysterious $29.

PWND!!!!!!

your a fck tard. the total expenses does not = 29 it is = to 27. go sck your moms man rod

 

[NoobieAudio 10+ year member]

That would only be possible if $30 was provided at the beginning, and then all of the other transactions occurred at the same time at the very end with a single concluding transaction.
Outside of that, in all of the real case scenarios we've provide, you = wrong.

You can't apply generalized theories to specific situations if they aren't logical.

PWND!!!!!!

 

[528hz 10+ year member]

Sorry I meant 27 not 29. And I'm sorry you can't comprehend this Noobie.....

that name fits nice.....

 

[mokedaddy 5,000+ posts]

Look you geniouseseesesee....let me enlighten you all...
(STOLEN FROM WIKI)

The invisible hand is a metaphor coined by the economist Adam Smith. In The Wealth of Nations and other writings, Smith demonstrated that, in a free market, an individual pursuing his own self-interest tends to also promote the good of his community as a whole through a principle that he called “the invisible hand”. He argued that each individual maximizing revenue for himself maximizes the total revenue of society as a whole, as this is identical with the sum total of individual revenues.

In this case the bell hop boy is the one pursuing his "own self interest" but so are the guys that are staying in the room. The "society" is the hotel or cash register. The "sum total of individual revenues" is the mysterious $29.

PWND!!!!!!

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

self pwnt??

Did you notice that doesnt include numbers? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Did you notice when dealing in numbers such as above you can do a little simple math and know that you are incorrect. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[MorningWood]

zomg, Adam Smith took my dollar! I never saw it coming (he used an invisible hand).

 

[528hz 10+ year member]

That would only be possible if $30 was provided at the beginning, and then all of the other transactions occurred at the same time at the very end with a single concluding transaction.
Outside of that, in all of the real case scenarios we've provide, you = wrong.

You can't apply generalized theories to specific situations if they aren't logical.

But $30 was provided at the beginning...

And it's a chain reaction. You can't have a residual if nothing was given/taken to begin with.

 

[mokedaddy 5,000+ posts]

But $30 was provided at the beginning...
And it's a chain reaction. You can't have a residual if nothing was given/taken to begin with.

And all 30 is accounted for //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[NoobieAudio 10+ year member]

Sorry I meant 27 not 29. And I'm sorry you can't comprehend this Noobie.....
that name fits nice.....

your so fcking retarded. now that you admit there is $27 and not $29 then how do you figure there is a missing dollar in the register? there isn't. 27 + 3 = 30 which is the total amount spent at the beginning. that means there is $3 to compensate for which in the $3 refunded to the 3 men.

 

[528hz 10+ year member]

And all 30 is accounted for //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Not from the consumers perspective...