I haz passive radiators.

I have some PR's here that I've been sitting on for years. Always meant to make a box for them. Very useful if you want to tune low in a small volume.
That's my whole M-O in my daily. I very, very rarely have more than 2 cubes in my trunk and tuning for

The one thing I ran into with this one is because of the baffle space required and the depth I wanted, the box turned out huge. I had to eat up a ton of airspace with big ass 45's in the corners. It's actually still too big for my liking. A redesign may be in order, but I haven't given up on this one yet.

 
Yes, it works just like a port. Except in this case the relationship between the box volume, cone area of the PR, and moving mass of the PR will affect the tuning frequency that you end up with.
I always though the function of adding/subtracting weight was to tune the Mms of the PR as close to the MMs of the Subwoofer as possible..as you said, the idea is to have the PR replicate the inward stroke to produce sound just like a port. I may be mistaken, but doesn't a properly tuned PR setup actually give the same output as a ported design, but across the whole response curve instead of a specific frequency?

 
I seriously doubt it if your system is designed correctly. That's one of the reasons behind having at least double the Sd or double the excursion for your passives.


No port noise, crap ton of "port area" without having to snake a huge port around in the box, smaller box because you don't have to account for port displacement.

Basically... all the advantages of a vented alignment without any of the downsides.

There are only two disadvantages of a PR... they rolloff faster below tuning... and the cost. That's it.
pr also have lag //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 
[quote name='quackhead']yea..I read that...I left my last posts just to just to say, "oops, i was wrong"..I am real curious of the outcome on @TaylorFade this little project.[/QUOTE]

Jury is still out since it's only been a few days. Still not low enough, but I hadn't anticipated the PR's needing to break in so it's getting lower and louder by the day. It's doing some good work, but it aint' happy on the low note of "Rack City."

Dont PR's need to be a little bigger then the sub our using? Such as a 12" PR for a 10" sub?

It's possible if that 12 has enough throw.

Rule of thumb at a minimum is double cone area or double the throw. e.g.- (1) 10" sub with 20mm of xmax and (2) 10" PR's with at least 10mm of throw or (1) 10" sub with 10mm and (1) 10" PR with at least 20mm.

From what I understand, you can use upwards of 8x the cone area.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

You're not trying to figure out the mass of air in your 3" port or whatever, you're trying to figure out the mass of air that you would need in an...
12
2K
well they list that frequence response so I will try to use it. Also, does it help to have the marine speakers in their towers for such a thing...
2
740
Yep. It would be a little over 3 wired in series, but that’s fine.
3
801
Agreed. I was actually thinking of building a 3-way passive and I compared the cost to a Dayton DSP and it makes no sense to go passive.
10
1K

About this thread

TaylorFade

10+ year member
I fail.
Thread starter
TaylorFade
Joined
Location
Baton Rouge, La.
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
39
Views
5,333
Last reply date
Last reply from
gckless
Screenshot 2024-04-28 at 11.25.22 AM.png

kanihoncho

    Apr 28, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
HU.png

kanihoncho

    Apr 28, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

Latest topics

Top