so from the picture u cant see but one of the writings say remote and the other near the circle (sub) it says bridged.what he's trying to say is, it does not matter that side of the terminals you use, ITS A MONO AMP. as long as you wire your sub the way i posted in the picture, and hook up the positive to one of the positives on the amp, and the negative to either of the negatives on the amp you will be fine.
or would this be better?what he's trying to say is, it does not matter that side of the terminals you use, ITS A MONO AMP. as long as you wire your sub the way i posted in the picture, and hook up the positive to one of the positives on the amp, and the negative to either of the negatives on the amp you will be fine.
so from the picture u cant see but one of the writings say remote and the other near the circle (sub) it says bridged.would this use the full potential of the sub?![]()
you only have 2 options you either put your sub at an 8 ohm or 2 ohm nominal impedance. 2 ohms will put your amp at it's lowest stable impedance thus putting out the most power.or would this be better?![]()
so what diagram would be best? and bridging the sub puts it at dual 2 ohm right?you only have 2 options you either put your sub at an 8 ohm or 2 ohm nominal impedance. 2 ohms will put your amp at it's lowest stable impedance thus putting out the most power.
none of your diagrams do anything, you clearly do not understand what the word mono means. so what that your amp has 2 speaker outputs. you only have a single output. also you do not "bridge" impedance/resistance, it's either series or parallel. you need to do what was told to you earlier in your thread.so what diagram would be best? and bridging the sub puts it at dual 2 ohm right?