but i just figured Oz spent a lot of time and research picking out the optimum xover points for my mid and tweet already...You can choose your crossover points, rather than in passive you have a fixed crossover setting.
Well people's musical tastes vary. Some like completely different sounding setups. It's all about your preference. Active is basically picking YOUR own tastes. In some cases, it sounds alot better than passive. But thats an opinion, not a fact. You'll just have to try it out, if you feel passive is good enough, then save your money. If not, buy an active setup, and see if it fits you better, cause you can always sell it later on.but i just figured Oz spent a lot of time and research picking out the optimum xover points for my mid and tweet already...
true but quality drivers and DIY setups do kick much more *** then just dialing something in, DIY ACTIVE FTWMy front stage was $180 total for 4 mids/2tweets and I've heard boxed comps up to $1k and IMO mine kills them...
Changing your current comps to active "might" not make a huge diff, but spending a few hundred on quality drivers and taking the time to dial them in would be well worth it.
or two 2 channel ampsyou'd need a 4 channel amp to go active //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
unless you ran something off your deck lol
You need a 4 channel amp if you want to do it.why is running active so great. ive never tried it but just wondering. ive have alpines 9887 with oz's 180cs off a 75x2 amp and have been thinkin about trying it.
thanks