idiot
10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
I've read that post before, which led to a discussion (on a different board) regarding the benefits to layering cement on the inside of a box as a mass-loading device.
But if you're arguing that matting is an insufficient means of adding mass and lowering resonance, why is sound deadening the door panels seen almost as a required action, here and on other boards? I doubt a few layers would come close to doubling the mass of the effective door panel area (I'm excluding anything above the window, which is not part of the enclosure, once covered), yet it seems to be effective (lowering vibrations merely one of many claimed benefits).
But if you're arguing that matting is an insufficient means of adding mass and lowering resonance, why is sound deadening the door panels seen almost as a required action, here and on other boards? I doubt a few layers would come close to doubling the mass of the effective door panel area (I'm excluding anything above the window, which is not part of the enclosure, once covered), yet it seems to be effective (lowering vibrations merely one of many claimed benefits).
