Design suggestions and WinISD confirmation

  • Thread starter lloydh
  • Replies 0
  • Views 483

lloydh

Junior Member
Hi,

I'm designing a sub box for two 12" Alpine Type Rs to be used in a blow-through config in my single cab Dodge, powered by a PDX 1.1000.

I want to maximise SQ but am looking to a ported enclosure for efficiency and bass extension.

I put the Type R's specs into WinISD which 'recommended' a 3.8cf enclosure tuned to 26.5Hz (with a 4" diameter x 10" length port).

26.5Hz seems low compared to others' ported enclosures, but the transfer function curve WinISD produced is very flat (see below).

7607161034A47DC730791B_m.png


Do these figures seem reasonable?

To be honest I'm unsure of how to build a dual sub ported enclosure.

Should the two drivers have isolated chambers like a sealed enclosure and does WinISD account for this?

Presumably two chambers will require two ports but when I double the number of ports in WinISD the required port length more than doubles.

Alternatively should I treat the drivers as completely separate and use WinISD to calculate the box dimensions for one driver and one port, then when I build the box use a central divider to create 2x WinISD's calculations?

Thanks

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

lloydh

Junior Member
Thread starter
lloydh
Joined
Location
United Kingdom
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
0
Views
483
Last reply date
Last reply from
lloydh
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_2118.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top