ThxOne
Premium Member
Staff Member
Your hypocrisy is scary huh?For someone who whines about how the past is referenced, you sure do a lot of it.
Ironic.
Your hypocrisy is scary huh?For someone who whines about how the past is referenced, you sure do a lot of it.
Ironic.
Right. So you agreed that it went in front of SCOTUS, and that means "it is legal".I am responding directly to you quoting my post again. My post has EVERYTHING to do with it. The one where you keep posting this...
View attachment 66053
Are you insisting you quoted my post, and then wrote something that had nothing to do with my post, or not?Then you just assume you are right and run off at the mouth like you won something before anyone responds. Man I would love to meet you.
I am responding directly to you quoting my post again. My post has EVERYTHING to do with it.You quoted my post in order to tell us something that had nothing to do with my post?
Are you too stupid to understand that the reason for quoting a post is to give your own post relevance in reference to what you are quoting?
You continue to demonstrate that your claimed superior knowlegde of the language is anyhting but.
I was never responding to what you said moron. You post such dumb shit that I have to ignore most of it. Like this shit, nobody said anything about the supreme court and you throw it into the conversation like we had been talking about it for 12 post already. You always add dumb shit to the conversation... usually you start them withRight. So you agreed that it went in front of SCOTUS, and that means "it is legal".
Except it never went in front of SCOTUS.
Or were you not referencing the quoted post when you replied?
I was never responding to what YOU wrote!!! Get that in your brick wall of a brain.Are you insisting you quoted my post, and then wrote something that had nothing to do with my post, or not?
Tough Guy? what's that supposed to mean?I'm sure you would, tough guy. But it wouldn't turn out the way your fantasy does.
But it's the interent, so you can have all the fantasies you want.
"I told you I wasn't answering YOUR dumbass question, I was finishing my post on the ruling. " -ThxoneI am responding directly to you quoting my post again. My post has EVERYTHING to do with it.
So you quoted my post in order to NOT respond to it.I was never responding to what you said moron. You post such dumb shit that I have to ignore most of it. Like this shit, nobody said anything about the supreme court and you throw it into the conversation like we had been talking about it for 12 post already. You always add dumb shit to the conversation... usually you start them with
Then you probably shouldn't hit the "Post Reply" icon/button.So, you blah blah blah?
I was never responding to what YOU wrote!!! Get that in your brick wall of a brain.
It means you are acting like a tough guy who wants to meet someone you accuse of "run(nning) off at the mouth".Tough Guy? what's that supposed to mean?
I quoted your post to respond to you, not it."I told you I wasn't answering YOUR dumbass question, I was finishing my post on the ruling. " -Thxone
Schizophrenia?
So you quoted my post in order to NOT respond to it.
What an odd thing to do.
Cool so go **** off somewhere else so nobody feels the need to respond to you.Is that part of your outside the box thinking? Irrelevant tangents and non-sequiturs?
Then you probably shouldn't hit the "Post Reply" icon/button.
A reply IS a response. It's literally the definition:
reply - say something in response to something someone has said.
Maybe I just want to have a conversation over coffee with no Google to help you and so I can see just how much of a smart mouth you think you would be able to get away with... what? Is that bad?It means you are acting like a tough guy who wants to meet someone you accuse of "run(nning) off at the mouth".
Or do you like to meet those people, so you can buy them a cola?
You could (literally) clarify (not literally) a million times and he'd still never get it. I do find it interesting that lower courts were able to determine Trump's actions were "unconstitutional" on other issues, but now it has to be the SCOTUS. There are videos on Youtube of local (ie city/county) judges tossing unconstitutional searches, so there must be some confusion about what judges have what powers. Luckily we have Rob here to clarify it all for us.What is actually your problem Rob? Seriously? I told you I wasn't answering YOUR dumbass question, I was finishing my post on the ruling. The only person bringing up the Supreme Court is you. Yet you keep repeating the same damn thing twisting shit to claim that I was talking about the Supreme Court. You can liken the way I was talking to the boss in Office Space. You are too stupid to even get that.
How many times does something have to be clarified before your brain lets you comprehend?
The courts are a cloudy area for me for sure. I kind of rely on Rob to show me when it is appropriate to be a hypocrite.You could (literally) clarify (not literally) a million times and he'd still never get it. I do find it interesting that lower courts were able to determine Trump's actions were "unconstitutional" on other issues, but now it has to be the SCOTUS. There are videos on Youtube of local (ie city/county) judges tossing unconstitutional searches, so there must be some confusion about what judges have what powers. Luckily we have Rob here to clarify it all for us.
Makes zero sense, but that goes for a lot you post here.I quoted your post to respond to you, not it.
So it's MY fault you have no self control?Cool so go **** off somewhere else so nobody feels the need to respond to you.
"so I can see just how much of a smart mouth you think you would be able to get away with"Maybe I just want to have a conversation over coffee with no Google to help you and so I can see just how much of a smart mouth you think you would be able to get away with... what? Is that bad?
Oh, there you are. I thought you were off crying liberal tears somewhere.Makes zero sense, but that goes for a lot you post here.
So it's MY fault you have no self control?
You stated that once before. Maybe see a therapist about it.
"so I can see just how much of a smart mouth you think you would be able to get away with"
Care to share what you would do that would stop me from "getting away with" anything? The forum mods wouldn't be there when you complained that I hurt your feelings, or said things that "offend" you. Would you write a sternly worded email to me?
Another failed backpedal.
Trump - Nancy, would you like some troops? Nancy, NO!!!!
Unless it's j6.
![]()
DOD details National Guard response to Capitol attack
WASHINGTON – Once the reality of the assault on the U.S. Capitol became apparent, National Guard troops responded appropriately and with alacrity, Department of Defense officials said in a phonewww.nationalguard.mil
Came here to post similar but yep, ww3 probably.
You quote a post so you can speak about something totally different?Oh, there you are. I thought you were off crying liberal tears somewhere.
It makes sense, just not to you. You should clarify that for others Rob.
Congrats?I have self control. I am not masturbating currently.
I posted my info, as did another guy here who you played tough guy with.As far as what I would do to you... well since you will spend the rest of your life in hiding there is no need to go into detail. We will never meet, you will make sure of it.
Telling someone they failed is no more a "left wing phrase" than you are the originator of the term "smooth brain".Do you just randomly burp up left wing phrases... or do you not know that by failing a backpedal you have done nothing?