Current events discussion

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Now that I argue with Rob, you can see his arguments a mile away. Ultimately, he rather create thus delusion about you saying SCOTUS ruled Trump's use of the Natl Guard than just accept thd courts sided with Trump. That path gives Rob everything he wants: in his mind, he's proven you wrong; in his mind, Trump remains in violation of the COTUS; if/when SCOTUS does rule in favor of Trump, that will jyst prove there has been a Fascist take over of ghe gov't and lastly Robs record moves to an impressive 1755 & 0.

Well crap!

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Just admit your life is trash if Trump isn't in it.

Nah, when Trump is gone he'll still compare everything to Trump for the next ~4 years. When Trump finally fades into the past, he'll just find a new existential threat to rant and rail against.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Decide what? That SCOTUS hasn't heard the case?
That's not a "decision" I made; it's just a fact.

Do you believe SCOTUS heard the case?


Incorrect. Again.
"Though it ruled in Trump’s favor, the court also rejected an argument from the Administration that the National Guard deployment could not be reviewed, however."

What the Appeals Court Said About Trump’s National Guard Power

A federal appeals court has overturned an earlier ruling that found the President’s mobilization of the troops was “illegal.”

time.com

That means it can be decided by another court whether it was legal.
That court would be SCOTUS, and COA doesn't get to decide if an act is constitutional, or not.

Whatever you say man.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Now that I argue with Rob, you can see his arguments a mile away. Ultimately, he rather create thus delusion about you saying SCOTUS ruled Trump's use of the Natl Guard than just accept thd courts sided with Trump. That path gives Rob everything he wants: in his mind, he's proven you wrong; in his mind, Trump remains in violation of the COTUS; if/when SCOTUS does rule in favor of Trump, that will jyst prove there has been a Fascist take over of ghe gov't and lastly Robs record moves to an impressive 1755 & 0.

I guess it was the frog in his pocket, his alter-ego, or maybe his caretaker?

Three judges on an appeals court. The Court of Appeals is not the SCOTUS. They do not decide whether something is constitutional, or not.
Are you, like Thxone, under the impression that they do?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nah, when Trump is gone he'll still compare everything to Trump for the next ~4 years. When Trump finally fades into the past, he'll just find a new existential threat to rant and rail against.

WHy not? Obama is still being brough up here, by those truying to claim he destoryed the country.
Trump is so obsessed with Biden, that he regularly tweets at 2AM how Biden "stole" the 2020 election.

But I guess that's acceptable here, because "orange man good"?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Whatever you say man.

Not what i say. What reality says.
Did you find the date that SCOTUS heard this case? I'd like to read about it.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

I guess it was the frog in his pocket, his alter-ego, or maybe his caretaker?
View attachment 66050

Three judges on an appeals court. The Court of Appeals is not the SCOTUS. They do not decide whether something is constitutional, or not.
Are you, like Thxone, under the impression that they do?

That's interesting, so you're now of the opinion that the SCOTUS & only the SCOTUS can determine if something is Constitutional. I think you're wrobg by a mile, but if there is one thing about you, you are super consistent. So I assume you will be retracting all those accusations that Trump's deportation & DOGE activities were unconstitutional since lower courts aren't able to make that determination. We await your reply.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

WHy not? Obama is still being brough up here, by those truying to claim he destoryed the country.
Trump is so obsessed with Biden, that he regularly tweets at 2AM how Biden "stole" the 2020 election.

But I guess that's acceptable here, because "orange man good"?

The only time I talk about "Where Do I Go Joe" is when you launch into another crusade about literal Sleepy Joe.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

And this is just DOGE. Can you imagine bigger programs? DOD has to be riddled with this shyt.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I guess it was the frog in his pocket, his alter-ego, or maybe his caretaker?
View attachment 66050

Three judges on an appeals court. The Court of Appeals is not the SCOTUS. They do not decide whether something is constitutional, or not.
Are you, like Thxone, under the impression that they do?

What is actually your problem Rob? Seriously? I told you I wasn't answering YOUR dumbass question, I was finishing my post on the ruling. The only person bringing up the Supreme Court is you. Yet you keep repeating the same damn thing twisting shit to claim that I was talking about the Supreme Court. You can liken the way I was talking to the boss in Office Space. You are too stupid to even get that.

How many times does something have to be clarified before your brain lets you comprehend?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

WHy not? Obama is still being brough up here, by those truying to claim he destoryed the country.
Trump is so obsessed with Biden, that he regularly tweets at 2AM how Biden "stole" the 2020 election.

But I guess that's acceptable here, because "orange man good"?

Tell us how Obama DIDN'T deport more illegals without due process than Trump. Go ahead... try to make that claim. Tell us how Obama did it "legal".

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Not what i say. What reality says.
Did you find the date that SCOTUS heard this case? I'd like to read about it.

Do you think being a sarcastic smart *** wins you anything?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

What is actually your problem Rob? Seriously? I told you I wasn't answering YOUR dumbass question, I was finishing my post on the ruling. The only person bringing up the Supreme Court is you. Yet you keep repeating the same damn thing twisting shit to claim that I was talking about the Supreme Court. You can liken the way I was talking to the boss in Office Space. You are too stupid to even get that.

How many times does something have to be clarified before your brain lets you comprehend?

You quoted my post in order to tell us something that had nothing to do with my post?

Are you too stupid to understand that the reason for quoting a post is to give your own post relevance in reference to what you are quoting?

You continue to demonstrate that your claimed superior knowlegde of the language is anyhting but.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Tell us how Obama DIDN'T deport more illegals without due process than Trump. Go ahead... try to make that claim. Tell us how Obama did it "legal".

For someone who whines about how the past is referenced, you sure do a lot of it.
Ironic.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You quoted my post in order to tell us something that had nothing to do with my post?

I am responding directly to you quoting my post again. My post has EVERYTHING to do with it. The one where you keep posting this...

Are you too stupid to understand that the reason for quoting a post is to give your own post relevance in reference to what you are quoting?

You continue to demonstrate that your claimed superior knowlegde of the language is anyhting but.

Then you just assume you are right and run off at the mouth like you won something before anyone responds. Man I would love to meet you.