audioholic
5,000+ posts
not a moderator
While I agree the chassis is not as resistance-free *** the power cable itself, that still does not bely the fact that laying your signal cable along your chassis is not the same as zip-tying to the power cable. While the chassis does and will dissipate the current flow through it, and have places of concentration, there's no getting around it cannot possibly be as concentrated as it is/was when travelling in the cable. IOW, the current passing through the 'hot spots' in your chassis (low resistance) will still not be as intense as passing the entire current through that (relatively) small cable. Not to mention, what would the chances be of running your signal wire all along this 'hot spot' in your chassis? Therefore, any magnetic field generated would be minimalized.So does the idea that you have the entire cross sectional area of the chassis available as a conducting path for a ground, but people still stick doggedly to that one.
The fact for both is that the steel in the chassis is not uniform and as such you get areas of high and low (relative) resistance. The majority of the current flows in the low resistance areas and these would act much like your power wire in regards to the field generated (slightly diffused). Best case these areas are 10x more resistive than copper and are nowhere near the 10x the cross sectional area of the power wire that you run making the idea that you need to keep your section of low resistance copper ground wire as short as possible totally laughable since the resistance of a few inches of large diameter copper wire is negligible compared to the several feet of high resistance autobody sheetmetal.
