Papermaker85
5,000+ posts
Banned
i've already explained this. butler say that because of there POOR *** feedback. no thanks.Man I love how Andy words stuff. Here's your feedback
Myth Busting: Damping Factor - A Misunderstood Rating
---------- Post added at 09:46 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:45 PM ----------
Now go away and only come back to talk about the woofers you are designing to be the best ever.
its simple if you cannot pull the inductance out of the circuit its going to generate feed back and alter the signal. these articals are old as me. the new stuff on the market has WAY bigger inductors and motors than they ever tested.
the feed back in the new high output drivers are WAY higher/stronger than they measured. sure in 1995 when you have 150-300 watts with a voice coil 2"s dia by 20mm tall and a 4 ohm RE the dampening factor was plenty high.
meaning that the amps output impedance was low enough to absorb it.. in the last 10 years that has all changed.
look at the parts used today. there resistance is higher as output increases and cap-banks have a higher ESP. there are ways around it but most companies dont use any techniques to increase the damping factor.
thats why these cheap amps sound like ****.
you say SQ in speakers is snake oil. dampening factor doesnt matter. it shows how little you actually know about the industry..
