Alpine Type R or Audiomobile Mass

[SSj4G60 10+ year member]

both seem to be what im looking for , a 10" sub for around 200 , anyone else have

other recomendations , im looking for SQ over SPL

Click to read more...

 

[KoBan715 10+ year member]

Which audiomobile are you looking to get? If its the EVO i would get the Alpine over the audiomobile EVO.

 

[da_bOm 10+ year member]

i have the Type R's and they have great SQ and they still hit nice

 

[Mark_ab 5,000+ posts]

See if you can't listen to both before you make your decision.

 

[excelonperu 10+ year member]

Alpine type R are really good, but you can get them for much less than 200, try http://www.ikesound.com or http://www.discountsjungle.com

you will find them for less than 120

 

[SSj4G60 10+ year member]

yea i found the Alpines somewhere for 125 , guess ill be goin w/ those

 

[SasquatchBump 10+ year member]

http://www.ikesound.com 119 shiping included

 

[Matt Overpeck 10+ year member]

The "Type R" is comparable to our entry level EVO series (though it does not have as much Xmax nor the alloy cone or SABOT motor of the EVO.

The MASS series is more comparable to the JL W7, as it has over 25 mm of Xmax, which is nearly 80% more then the Alpine "top of the line" subs.

Hope that helps!

Matt

Audiomobile

 

[Ganji 10+ year member]

is it me, or did he just make a valid comment

 

[jlaine 10+ year member]

Originally posted by SSj4G60 both seem to be what im looking for , a 10" sub for around 200 , anyone else have

other recomendations , im looking for SQ over SPL

The EVO or MASS?

Personally, either one sonically sounded superior to the Type R I played with. It's been about a year since I've heard any of them, but I do recall that much out of the situation. The cost/performance ratio of the type r is quite excellent, but I would have had no problems stepping up to say, the mass, as the price seemed justified in the listening test.

 

[RangerMan Premium Member]

Originally posted by Matt Overpeck The "Type R" is comparable to our entry level EVO series (though it does not have as much Xmax nor the alloy cone or SABOT motor of the EVO.

 

The MASS series is more comparable to the JL W7, as it has over 25 mm of Xmax, which is nearly 80% more then the Alpine "top of the line" subs.

 

Hope that helps!

 

Matt

 

Audiomobile

How dare you diss Alpine...they have been making audio products for longer than you have been ******* liquid meat through a straw, you old mutha****er...

 

[nismo 10+ year member]

Originally posted by jlaine  

The EVO or MASS?

 

Personally, either one sonically sounded superior to the Type R I played with. It's been about a year since I've heard any of them, but I do recall that much out of the situation. The cost/performance ratio of the type r is quite excellent, but I would have had no problems stepping up to say, the mass, as the price seemed justified in the listening test.

matthew...despite how much you have given mr. laine a rough time about being biased against you, and showing that you can be a selfish, inconsiderate ***, he just said something positive about your products...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

eric

 

[SSj4G60 10+ year member]

how about these

http://www.carstereotime.com/audiobahn/alum10q.html