Added nitrous to my car.

[phantom240 5,000+ posts]

Dude are you really that retarded? So instead of trying prove me wrong, you just talk more shit, typical. Then you blab on about circuit racing, etc... Oh and great you don't like hondas and they were designed for getting groceries, that's fine, still doesn't change the facts lol. Anyways back to the topic I am talking about, like I said in previous posts, an 8 injector setup running 440-550cc injectors would easily do the job, so your wrong and I am right... YOU = OWNED. You can also get good gas mileage out of large injectors with good tuning. I guess you also don't realize you won't be driving around with 700whp on the street? The boost will be way down, so probably more like 400whp on pump gas on the street.
Here's the 700whp honda he daily drives you stupid fuk... http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1582472

8 440-550cc injectors is a lot of fuel. Im not retarded like you think. I know a lot more about how injector cycle tuning and fuel maps change a lot of characteristics of the motor including fuel economy. Youre a ****in honda fanboy. Do you honestly think that 700hp means anything? NO. Cuz its still producing 112lb/ft of torque. So while youre waiting for your top end, everyone else will have already layed down a nice set of black stripes. And the info you post STILL DOESNT prove a god **** thing. How does it prove it gets good mileage? Im not saying you cant get BETTER mileage with good tuning. I know that for a fact. But youre never going to get GREAT mileage with a high performance motor. Period.

YOU = PWNED by being honduh-tized.

Im finished with your bullshit. If someone else wants to make an intelligent suggestion, go right ahead. Honduh has destroyed your brain cells and reasoning ability.

 

[Tiger Bass 5,000+ posts]

And on the topic of Honda, its only getting more and more expensive to customize them because everyone who owns a Honda thinks they can be the next Andretti. Demand increases therefore price increases. You want to get a car thats cheap and easy to fix up. Get an old school Corrolla.

 

[j3bus2k3 5,000+ posts]

And on the topic of Honda, its only getting more and more expensive to customize them because everyone who owns a Honda thinks they can be the next Andretti. Demand increases therefore price increases. You want to get a car thats cheap and easy to fix up. Get an old school Corrolla.

Actually...in the pure terms of economics, not necessarily the real world, as demand for a product increase, price decreases. People are going to want for of a product that doesnt cost as much. But in real world terms...busniess owners are going to slowly increase the price to make an extra buck...

 

[bbka 10+ year member]

8 440-550cc injectors is a lot of fuel. Im not retarded like you think. I know a lot more about how injector cycle tuning and fuel maps change a lot of characteristics of the motor including fuel economy. Youre a ****in honda fanboy. Do you honestly think that 700hp means anything? NO. Cuz its still producing 112lb/ft of torque. So while youre waiting for your top end, everyone else will have already layed down a nice set of black stripes. And the info you post STILL DOESNT prove a god **** thing. How does it prove it gets good mileage? Im not saying you cant get BETTER mileage with good tuning. I know that for a fact. But youre never going to get GREAT mileage with a high performance motor. Period.

Haha your so pathetic. You = Owned again for not knowing what your talking about before you post. Your wrong and here is why. Obviously you missed the thread I posted about raven motorsports? Yeah they can modify your ECU to run 8 injectors, when out of vtec/boost you will only be running 4 injectors, then when vtec/boost hits the extra set of injector kick in. So that's not a lot of fuel if setup this way, idiot. How do you prove it? Just look at any of 300whp honda with 440-550cc injectors, they get great gas mileage when not in boost if tuned well. Just use that formula I was talking about, 300 miles out of a 10 gallon tank equals 30mpg (obviously it will vary depending on miles, size of tank, etc...).

Bahaha 112ft/lbs of torque? Yeah maybe on an all motor stock honda. On your average 700whp 2.0L built honda try more like 400-500 ft/lb of torque at the wheels. Example... http://forums.evans-tuning.com/viewtopic.php?t=3928 Obviously you can see the powerband is very high, peaks at 500 ft/lbs and stays abov 400 ft/lbs through the meaty part of the powerband, not bad for such a small motor. You will usually see at least a good 3,000rpms of good solid torque on a very high horsepower setup like this, depending on headwork and with a short geared ****** it works (drag strip only setup of course). This car right here would have no problems running 9's with the right traction setup and driver.

Here's a much better example of a setup that would own on the street in a lite honda, staged boost controller, and some fatty drag radials (well fatty for a honda lol). Now this is a sweet powerband... http://forums.evans-tuning.com/viewtopic.php?t=2993

 

[Tiger Bass 5,000+ posts]

Actually...in the pure terms of economics, not necessarily the real world, as demand for a product increase, price decreases. People are going to want for of a product that doesnt cost as much. But in real world terms...busniess owners are going to slowly increase the price to make an extra buck...

I understand what you are saying, Im taking economics this semester. But its really all relative. In terms of pure economics when you look at supply and demand, you typically look at the supply and demand from the manufacturer to the store owner. The store owner on the other hand works almost completely opposite and looks for any reason to raise his price therefore to increase their net profit. But once again, its all relative.

 

[j3bus2k3 5,000+ posts]

I understand what you are saying, Im taking economics this semester. But its really all relative. In terms of pure economics when you look at supply and demand, you typically look at the supply and demand from the manufacturer to the store owner. The store owner on the other hand works almost completely opposite and looks for any reason to raise his price therefore to increase their net profit. But once again, its all relative.

I hated economics...it was all online though so I never had to attend the lecture //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gif

 

[phantom240 5,000+ posts]

And on the topic of Honda, its only getting more and more expensive to customize them because everyone who owns a Honda thinks they can be the next Andretti. Demand increases therefore price increases. You want to get a car thats cheap and easy to fix up. Get an old school Corrolla.

Hardcore drifters already have dibs on em. Saw one in pristine condition, 225k miles, and bone stock. She sold for 4500. Ppl on that forum thought he sold himself short.

Oh and BBKA. That is officially the first honduh ive seen that can actually produce torque. That still doesnt mean they are worth a squirrel fart though. The fact of the matter is, youre stuck in honduh world.. Honda this, civic with boost that... Whereas the rest of us have better things to waste our money on. Like cars that perform well from the factory, or dont have FWD, or look halfway decent. Also, that second honda is still in the torque free spectrum of things. How many fast cars prodce half as much tq as hp? not many. The real world > you.

Im finished. Say what you want i really wont care.

 

[Tiger Bass 5,000+ posts]

I like economics //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[bbka 10+ year member]

Haha dude I'm not stuck in the honda world, you don't know me at all. I just can't stand it when people that are uneducated about hondas talk shit about hondas, when they don't know what they are capable of, so I like to prove them wrong. I like all kinds of cars man. I have a 68 Chevy shortwide with a mildly built 327 (edelbrock heads, intake, cams, carb, etc...) that I like to play with (you would have known that if you read any of my previous posts). I also love driving my parents 2005 LS2 equipped Chevy SSR, rwd kicks ***. I'm also getting into sportbikes recently and will be getting one next spring when the weather gets better. Just because I know about hondas doesn't mean I hate on everything else. P.S. I can find you plenty more hondas like those two I posted. The torque goes through the roof on hondas when you add a turbo, it might not be as much as a big V8, but in a lite *** honda it equals a lot! Plus too much low end torque equals wheel spin for us, so carrying the torque as high as possible is our goal.

 

[93 saturn sl2 10+ year member]

And what is soooo wrong with the 5.0?? Hmm??
btw the 302 has been in more than 2 years of mustangs.... actually was in mustang for almost 20 years

but 94-95 mustang was the worst years made

Nothings wrong with the 5.0 except it made 215hp your year, which is pathetic for a v8.

Plus I hate the 94-98 body style. So im my opinion they are the worst Mustangs made except for the Mustang IIs.

 

[1loudsuv 10+ year member]

Nothings wrong with the 5.0 except it made 215hp your year, which is pathetic for a v8.
Plus I hate the 94-98 body style. So im my opinion they are the worst Mustangs made except for the Mustang IIs.

i cant renember exactly how much my truck came with stock i think it was 210 horsepower and yah pretty much they kind of **** stock but they sell everything for 5.0's EVERYTHING...

388 RWHP from my explorer after all the mods.

best time was 13.3..

and that was with a 150 shot of nos

i can only imagine what it was doing when i had a supercharger and 75 shot or when i was shoting 180 shot

it was kindaof funny going to the track and people laughing and on the way back from teh run i would have like 15 people asking wtf is in their //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif first time they seen an explorer with slicks and hang with some of the faster big block cars and actually beat some lol

i renember one like it was yesterday he had a 454 el camino and man my freind was like his gonna beat us and im like naw i doubt it i have a big fealing he wont. and he didnt and no he didnt have engine problems just a stock 454 with intake headers and carb

but yah some of those little hondas sure are fast me my next project will beeither the explorer again try to break into the solid 12s or 11s or justbuy a 2 door civic and see how fast i can get that

 

[Prowler573 5,000+ posts]

you bought a GTO.....and its not even 5 speed?

Just an //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif nobody with a late-model GTO optioned with a MT has a 5-speed. The MT-optioned GTOs from '04 and forward are 6-speed cars. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

Nothings wrong with the 5.0 except it made 215hp your year, which is pathetic for a v8.
Plus I hate the 94-98 body style. So im my opinion they are the worst Mustangs made except for the Mustang IIs.

I do not recall exactly which year it was but in the 80s the 5.7L 350cid v8 motors in the 'Vettes were rated at something like 180hp which is even worse //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[93 saturn sl2 10+ year member]

I do not recall exactly which year it was but in the 80s the 5.7L 350cid v8 motors in the 'Vettes were rated at something like 180hp which is even worse //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Yeah the older 5.7s in the Irocs, vettes, etc are lame too.

 

[Ford302Redneck 10+ year member]

Nothings wrong with the 5.0 except it made 215hp your year, which is pathetic for a v8.
Plus I hate the 94-98 body style. So im my opinion they are the worst Mustangs made except for the Mustang IIs.

Its all about the troque, and the 5.0s have plenty... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

HP aint nothin but a braggin right, troque wins races.

I guess thats why I own a mustang and you dont, they would be to good for you anyways.

 

[saywhat? 5,000+ posts]

actually 5.0s wasnt around then, if your recalling the Boss 302? Thats not the same block at all. Back then they had a 289 which is basicly the same as the now known 302. but IIRC 302s began there way into mustangs around ~1978 when the first fox body was introducted
As far the foxbody, same motor I got basicly. weak, yeah wasnt the strongest thang around, I agree. Most reliable, **** right, cant get to much better. Stock 302s will go 200,000+miles EASY.

LOL i said FORD had 302's in 67. not mustangs. i think f100's have had 302's since 67, and I know they were around back then as my 72 has a 302