The contradiction is from previous statements made by Stephen Mantz himself several years back when the fullrange class d amps started hitting the market. I distinctly remember post on another forum down talking the pdx amps specfically... Now he's making full range class d....... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifcontradiction not found...
"So what is required are amplifiers that use the available electrical power more efficiently
BUT with no loss of fidelity or power. Several options are available. Class B amplifiers are
notoriously inefficient due to the fact that they are linear devices and in their traditional form
waste about 70-80% of the power supplied to them as heat. Class A amplifiers do not even
think about for mobile use as their efficiency is even worse. So what options are available?
Class D is the one of them. For most audio buffs, class D has been given a bad rap owing to
the rash of really bad class D amplifiers which have been introduced to the mobile market
over the years. There are several reasons why these amplifiers sounded bad and were
unreliable. The bad sound was due to the fact that the designers/copycats had no idea on
how a class D amplifier functions. The reliability was due to bad design and almost zero
knowledge of class D amplifiers.
This technology has made leaps and bounds over the past 5 odd years. New semiconductor
devices have become available as well as a better understanding of this type of amplifier."
