9/11 was an inside job

Nice try at trying to insult someone who is after justifying the deaths of thousands of people who were ruthlessly murdered, I have several several several hundred hours of research upon this subject so please it's not doing you any good trying to insult me when you are being very ignorant yourself.
I have several hours of research by watching "loose change"

 
I already explained how jet fuel could/would/did bring down 2 skyscrapers, in your previous thread where you made this same claim. I even posted a link to a video where the History Channel did their own testing and found that burning jet fuel easily burns hot enough to de-carbonize the steel and weaken it to a point that it would undoubtedly fail under the stress the WTC beams were subjected to. Clearly you are not open to evidence that contradicts your conspiracy theory, which means you have beaten yourself in this debate.
Your 'free fall' comment makes too little sense to even reply to. Gibberish.

Troll.


Jet fuel burns at a MAX of around 1500 degrees, steel melts around twice that temperature at 2800-3000 degrees, so obviously the jet fuel did not cause the tons of molten steel that was found at the world trade towers. The bush administration had previously stated that the jet fuel had completely burnt away within a matter of a a minute. So jet fuel cannot and never will cause steel to melt, so why was there so much molten steel? There has to be something else obviously causing it.

 
So obviously 1400 architect's and engineers are wrong right? They have a lot more knowledge in this subject then any of you, I would much rather trust someone who has gone to school for building demolition then the government. What about the nano thermite that scientist had found at all 3 towers on the day of 9/11?

 
Jet fuel burns at a MAX of around 1500 degrees, steel melts around twice that temperature at 2800-3000 degrees, so obviously the jet fuel did not cause the tons of molten steel that was found at the world trade towers. The bush administration had previously stated that the jet fuel had completely burnt away within a matter of a a minute. So jet fuel cannot and never will cause steel to melt, so why was there so much molten steel? There has to be something else obviously causing it.
Re-read what I said. I did not say the jet fuel 'melted' the steel. This is the hang-up in logic that you 911 conspiracists always cling to, that the support beams 'melted'. As for why molten steel was found in the wreckage, I would be surprised to NOT find melted steel in the bottom of that rubble pile. Its existence does not, in any way, prove the support beams in the towers melted to cause the collapse.

Did you even look at the video I provided in the previous thread testing the jet fuel fire versus steel beam test? Obviously not. Seems your 'research' is limited to seeing what you want to see.

 
like i said in previous post bro... you can put all the proof in the world in front of these loons, and they will just continue to scream CONSPIRACY!!!! ... trying to reason with them just doesnt work, thats why i make fun of them.

 
like i said in previous post bro... you can put all the proof in the world in front of these loons, and they will just continue to scream CONSPIRACY!!!! ... trying to reason with them just doesnt work, thats why i make fun of them.
As many people here know, I certainly do not trust my government. But Ive yet to see any good evidence that our govt had any involvement in carrying out the WTC destruction.

 
and i agree with you... in NO way am i saying that our govt is completely trust worthy, or that 9/11 wasnt somewhat preventable...

just that the pure logistics of a conspiracy of this magnitude arent possible... i have been working for the govt for 10 years now (on active duty, and now on the civilian side) ... with a high security clearance... and trust me, someone would talk!!

just the pure logistics of pulling something like that off would require THOUSANDS of people in the know. and every single one of them is still quiet??? give me a break!

 
You're sweet. 

---------- Post added at 08:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:21 AM ----------

 

fixt
lol this forum knows no grammar!

And swype is lagging on me :/

That's actually pretty simple. They monitor air traffic via radar. These pilots flew below the radar. There is a well known story of one going down the hudson to find his way because his own instruments didn't work correctly at such low altitude. That was always their plan. It's what they trained for.
That might pose a problem in finding the plane after hijacking, but they didn't even respond immediately.

But we're picking at the minute details here. Like arguing how did they find their target if the instruments weren't working at such a low altitude and so on...

Let's not digress and resort to petty arguments though. I'm not agreeing with the "US made it happen", but there is definitely some corruption in our government relating to it happening.

And as far as the steel weakening and collapsing, even if it did, and the floors came down on one another, it is still not going to fall at free fall speed. Only way that could happen is if each floor collapsed before the floors above it came down. Even if it was fractions of a second, it would surely be distinguishable from a demolition


 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

themgators511

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Elite
Thread starter
themgators511
Joined
Location
plant city, FL
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
117
Views
3,095
Last reply date
Last reply from
schackel
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top