nonetheless, one thing we are consistent with is the degree of pwning we deliver.That's only because we can play either side. Did you see me actually somewhat defend minorities and affirmative action. I surprise myself sometimes.
correlation, time order, and non-spuriousness - phrase it any way you like.Oh I see....
How could/should I phrase that to hit all 3 points?
To tell the truth, I did not know about the third point.
The third point is vital; you have to prove that change in the independent variable precedes change in the dependent variable.
Let's take the RvW vs. abortion case then:
The independant variable is RvW
The depedant variable is reduction in crime.
Displaying whether or not RvW precedes that change would be rather simple in this case.