How dangerous is bluetooth in cars - health concerns about cancer etc?

[huberoy123 10+ year member]

this sounds so comforting and I want to believe like a good boy, but I don’t trust government nor there biased studies in the FDA. There is plenty of research to show that there are changes on a cellular level when exposed to BT, depending on the strength level of course but these Consumer BT devices emit enough power to cause cells to change. Believe in whatever makes you feel safe, ignorance is bliss

So is denying the "Science." We have to wait for further studies.........

 

[Jeffdachef 5,000+ posts]

this sounds so comforting and I want to believe like a good boy, but I don’t trust government nor there biased studies in the FDA. There is plenty of research to show that there are changes on a cellular level when exposed to BT, depending on the strength level of course but these Consumer BT devices emit enough power to cause cells to change. Believe in whatever makes you feel safe, ignorance is bliss

its all inconclusive research from weak sources vs pubmed resources from accredited universities. Keep the tin foil hat on since everything in existence is out to kill us with that mentality while the human average lifespan is increasing every decade.

 

[Radiospank 10+ year member]

So is denying the "Science." We have to wait for further studies.........

But I didn’t say I was denying science, I’m just saying quoting the FDA should be received with caution as with any big entity they skew the data to fit their narrative.

 

[Radiospank 10+ year member]

its all inconclusive research from weak sources vs pubmed resources from accredited universities. Keep the tin foil hat on since everything in existence is out to kill us with that mentality while the human average lifespan is increasing every decade.

lol ok I’ll just take what jeffdachief from Caraudio.com said for proof. Do you have any idea about research and what it entails? Just because someone did a study from an “accredited” university doesn’t mean it paints the whole picture, but rather one that is bound by constraints amongst other things. Again calling out those that are cautious with “tinfoil hat” crew just shows your ignorance and maturity. luckily this is the Internet where Trolls live and I came to play

 

[Jeffdachef 5,000+ posts]

lol ok I’ll just take what jeffdachief from Caraudio.com said for proof. Do you have any idea about research and what it entails? Just because someone did a study from an “accredited” university doesn’t mean it paints the whole picture, but rather one that is bound by constraints amongst other things. Again calling out those that are cautious with “tinfoil hat” crew just shows your ignorance and maturity. luckily this is the Internet where Trolls live and I came to play

i'd trust accredited sources on done a large sample size and collective researches done and published on pubmed over tin foil claims of a "bigger picture" from a random on the internet any day.

Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices

Radiation exposure has long been a concern for the public, policy makers, and health researchers. Beginning with radar during World War II, human exposure to radio-frequency radiation (RFR) technologies has grown substantially over time. In 2011, the ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Effect of Bluetooth headset and mobile phone electromagnetic fields on the human auditory nerve - PubMed

The outcomes of the present study show that, contrary to the finding that the latency and amplitude of CNAPs are very sensitive to EMFs produced by the tested mobile phone, the EMFs produced by a common Bluetooth device do not induce any significant change in cochlear nerve activity. The...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - a hard nut to crack (Review)

In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Jeffdachef 5,000+ posts]

 

[huberoy123 10+ year member]

But I didn’t say I was denying science, I’m just saying quoting the FDA should be received with caution as with any big entity they skew the data to fit their narrative.

You are correct when you say that we should be cautious.
How about we agree to disagree. Love you brother.

 

[Radiospank 10+ year member]

You are correct when you say that we should be cautious.
How about we agree to disagree. Love you brother.

my thoughts exactly.

 

[rsrguy]

Worry about man-made radiation tx should be the last thing anyone worries about when it comes to cancer... The first thing should be diet. Does the OP have sugar as a source of daily caloric intake? Turns out sugars anaerobicly feed cancers. Do they intake enough pesticide free vegetables, how about good fat and quality, hormone free protein....
I do an OK job of eating lean, when I'm in the zone... but two years ago at 48 I had my first melanoma cut from my face.... it wasn't caused by 5g or man-made radiation..... Just bad genes and natural radiation.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

But I didn’t say I was denying science, I’m just saying quoting the FDA should be received with caution as with any big entity they skew the data to fit their narrative.

So, you think it's "Fake News"?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

View attachment 23636

Wait, I thought our President was smarter than the scientists. Maybe, we should ask him this question.

 

[Wogic]

it causes severe brain tumors, low sperm count, enlarged male breasts, anal leakage, ruptured prostate.....im sure more people will chime in with more symptoms

Erectile disfunction for me

 

[Popwarhomie 5,000+ posts]

So glad you bumped this year old thread to share that...

 

[figgie]

queue the goat!

 

[trumpet 5,000+ posts]

As a 2-time cancer survivor and skeptic I have no concerns about RF from Bluetooth. With 2+ decades of widespread deployment it would be well understood if there is a correlation between BT radio emissions and instances of cancers rising.