You mad at Obama?WERE YOU MAD WHEN..........?

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

Audioholic is doing some major pwning on you fools //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Do you live in this area? How in Sam Hill would you have any idea?

You live near a GM plant, and there are 'several' racist republicans that live in your area. Why, you obviously live in the sprawling city of Wronginformationthatyoudontwantustobeabletolookupville.

I dont remember, did I call you a fucking moron dildo yet? If not, you are.

You aren't doing Democrats any favors here. Im sure any decent, smart dems reading this, wish you'd just shut up right about now. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 

[Wingsfreak9 10+ year member]

^In case anyone doesn't recognize it, this is what abates looks like when he's squirming. ^
Ive finally figured you out. The more exclamation marks you use, the more you are running away from your original stance.

You are clearly implying the KKK is predominantly republicans. Because after all, republicans are naturally racists. Hence you being so confident in your belief that you didnt even bother to google it before making your claim. So when I DID google it, and post that the KKK was founded mainly by white southern separatist Democrats, all you can come up with is "they changed" with a bunch of exclamation marks. Nice going. Clearly you know as much about the KKK's political ties as you do about the UAW, jack shit.

And in any event, you still failed miserably, as your attempt was to solidify that its republicans who are traditionally, morally, and unquestionably the racist party. Even if the KKK is 50/50 politically these days (and not saying they are, just to give your latest guess the benefit of the doubt), it still shows 1) Democrats are just as capable of racism as republicans, and 2) you are so strong in your convictions, that you wont bother looking up facts before spouting off at the mouth on a topic you clearly dont know much about.

So now you shift your stance again. Okay, you wont dispute that the KKK was founded by democrats (because you CANT), while simultaneously neglect to accept this means dems are just as capable as republicans of being racist. But oh, only dems 145 years ago.

Ulysses Grant, a republican, is credited with killing the KKK with the republican Ku Klux Klan act of 1871. So that 145 years is now dwindled to 130 some odd years. Still a long time ago, right?

Woodrow Wilson, also a Democrat, is credited with promoting the resurrection of the KKK in the early 1900's via the movie Birth of a Nation. 145 years is now down to 90 years.

I guess you also didnt bother to find out Harry Truman, a Democrat, was a prominant figures in the KKK. So now your 145 year theory has shrunk to, what, 65 years?

And if you had bothered to look up your claim, you would have also noted that a former KKK recruiter, Robert Byrd, was elevated to third in line to the presidency (and, of course, a Senator) in 1980. So your 145 years has now dwindled to 30 years. Even less if we include the time this former KKK recruiter continued to be a US (democratic) senator.

But I guess your vast knowledge of the KKK, based on, I dont know, the fact that 'several' republicans in your area are racist, has somehow uncovered evidence that in the past 30 years, the KKK has done a 180 degree turn in its party affiliation.

In other words, you are so full of shit its coming out of your ears. Moron. You are too chickenshit to have the guts to say "oops, I was wrong". Even when irrefutable evidence is presented supporting this. You are absolutely pathetic. Between your knowledge of history, and unions, and Prox's vast economics education, you two might be able to put your brain power together and generate enough energy to power a light bulb.

roflcopter

cliffs?

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

cliffs?

abates is a dumbass.

I can make it even shorter. abates = dumbass.

And even shorter yet, lets just call him dumbass.

 

[50 black guys 10+ year member]

Umm obama isnt helping many people... And i sure as hell was mad when i learned those things (the ones i actually knew about :/)

**** obama give me my money back! oh yeah thats right, he gave millions on top of millions of dallars to people serving life sentences or who are deceased, GREAT!

 

[abates 10+ year member]

^In case anyone doesn't recognize it, this is what abates looks like when he's squirming. ^
Ive finally figured you out. The more exclamation marks you use, the more you are running away from your original stance.

You are clearly implying the KKK is predominantly republicans. Because after all, republicans are naturally racists. Hence you being so confident in your belief that you didnt even bother to google it before making your claim. So when I DID google it, and post that the KKK was founded mainly by white southern separatist Democrats, all you can come up with is "they changed" with a bunch of exclamation marks. Nice going. Clearly you know as much about the KKK's political ties as you do about the UAW, jack shit.

And in any event, you still failed miserably, as your attempt was to solidify that its republicans who are traditionally, morally, and unquestionably the racist party. Even if the KKK is 50/50 politically these days (and not saying they are, just to give your latest guess the benefit of the doubt), it still shows 1) Democrats are just as capable of racism as republicans, and 2) you are so strong in your convictions, that you wont bother looking up facts before spouting off at the mouth on a topic you clearly dont know much about.

So now you shift your stance again. Okay, you wont dispute that the KKK was founded by democrats (because you CANT), while simultaneously neglect to accept this means dems are just as capable as republicans of being racist. But oh, only dems 145 years ago.

Ulysses Grant, a republican, is credited with killing the KKK with the republican Ku Klux Klan act of 1871. So that 145 years is now dwindled to 130 some odd years. Still a long time ago, right?

Woodrow Wilson, also a Democrat, is credited with promoting the resurrection of the KKK in the early 1900's via the movie Birth of a Nation. 145 years is now down to 90 years.

I guess you also didnt bother to find out Harry Truman, a Democrat, was a prominant figures in the KKK. So now your 145 year theory has shrunk to, what, 65 years?

And if you had bothered to look up your claim, you would have also noted that a former KKK recruiter, Robert Byrd, was elevated to third in line to the presidency (and, of course, a Senator) in 1980. So your 145 years has now dwindled to 30 years. Even less if we include the time this former KKK recruiter continued to be a US (democratic) senator.

But I guess your vast knowledge of the KKK, based on, I dont know, the fact that 'several' republicans in your area are racist, has somehow uncovered evidence that in the past 30 years, the KKK has done a 180 degree turn in its party affiliation. Evidence you ... forgot ... to post.

In other words, you are so full of shit its coming out of your ears. Moron. You are too chickenshit to have the guts to say "oops, I was wrong". Even when irrefutable evidence is presented supporting this. You are absolutely pathetic. Between your knowledge of history, and unions, and Prox's vast economics education, you two might be able to put your brain power together and generate enough energy to power a light bulb.

roflcopter

To further educate you, in the 1800's Democrats were conservative & Republicans were liberal. Do you agree or disagree?

As I have already told you once, I live 25 minutes from Pulaski, TN so I know quite a bit about the KKK. Some of my cousins & people that I worked with were members.

 

[abates 10+ year member]

And there are plenty of republicans in your area that are not racist, plenty of democrats that are racists, and plenty of democrats that arent racists. Would you like to present any other completely irrelevant 'facts' that you hope we dont bother to fact-check? Hey I know, next you should claim Reagan was the grand wizard of the klan, and GW Bush owns slaves. Fucking dildo.

Boy you right wingers sure are sensitive lil bishes LOL!

 

[abates 10+ year member]

abates is a dumbass.
I can make it even shorter. abates = dumbass.

And even shorter yet, lets just call him dumbass.

You can use profanity at me all you want, it just shows that you are a weak debater.

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

To further educate you, in the 1800's Democrats were conservative & Republicans were liberal. Do you agree or disagree?
As I have already told you once, I live 25 minutes from Pulaski, TN so I know quite a bit about the KKK. Some of my cousins & people that I worked with were members.

The Dems were always statists until it came to a few things on the sovereignty of how they ran their plantations. Can you guess what that included?

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

"We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing. With some the word liberty may mean for each man to do as he pleases with himself, and the product of his labor; while with others, the same word may mean for some men to do as they please with other men, and the product of other men's labor. Here are two, not only different, but incompatible things, called by the same name-liberty. And it follows that each of the things is, by the respective parties called by two different and incompatible names- liberty and tyranny."

Abraham Lincoln, 1864

Does not seem very liberal to me........

 

[abates 10+ year member]

Umm obama isnt helping many people... And i sure as hell was mad when i learned those things (the ones i actually knew about :/)
**** obama give me my money back! oh yeah thats right, he gave millions on top of millions of dallars to people serving life sentences or who are deceased, GREAT!

Anybody care to respond to this ^

 

[abates 10+ year member]

"We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing. With some the word liberty may mean for each man to do as he pleases with himself, and the product of his labor; while with others, the same word may mean for some men to do as they please with other men, and the product of other men's labor. Here are two, not only different, but incompatible things, called by the same name-liberty. And it follows that each of the things is, by the respective parties called by two different and incompatible names- liberty and tyranny."Abraham Lincoln, 1864

Does not seem very liberal to me........

There is not as much of a difference between the 2 parties as the right wing corporate media wishes for you to believe.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

What does the KKK have to do with this?

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

There is not as much of a difference between the 2 parties as the right wing corporate media wishes for you to believe.

Which media on the right wing is any more or less corperate than NBC, CBS or ABC? Also what does that have anything to do with the post I made showing you wrong? You do realize Lincoln was the first Republican president correct?

 

[abates 10+ year member]

Which media on the right wing is any more or less corperate than NBC, CBS or ABC? Also what does that have anything to do with the post I made showing you wrong? You do realize Lincoln was the first Republican president correct?

fox, limbaugh, boortz, hannity, levin, savage, coulter, o'reilly, beck, maulkin, rove, morris