//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif OMG like you were around for ANY of it. Unless you were listening to music back when it was released you have NO basis for reference. I'm not a Zepplin fan either but I remember alot of their music when I was a little shithead. Listening to music when its released has a much bigger impact then listening to it when it's 20 years old. Kinda like anti-war music back during Nam. Unless you were there you don't know. Do I think they were over rated?? Yes I do. But they were unique back then and there has been no one like them today.all the reason to not like them IMO. the thing that gets me is that people say they were so groundbreaking and rediculously talented. now, I will agree that as a band they had their shit together, wether you like it or not, but alone none of them are worth shit. just a bunch of ****s doing drugs and making bad music.
.but alone none of them are worth shit
randy rhoads owns zakk wylde.
and part two:
![]()
or perhaps even the black knight:
![]()