Hi everyone,
I've tried searching for a direct comparison for all three Type R subs (swr 1022, 1023, 1042, 1043) but I have yet to find a thread anywhere on the net. So here goes mine.
I am looking to install a single 10" sub in my 2000 SS camaro.
The enclosure that I'm going to use is an MTX stealth box with .6 cubic feet
I am planning on buying one of these two amps. Which one is the best fit?:
alpine mrp-m500 $150 Shipped
# mono subwoofer car amplifier
# 300 watts RMS x 1 at 4 ohms (500 watts RMS x 1 at 2 ohms)
# variable low-pass filter (50-200 Hz, 24 dB/octave)
# variable bass boost (0-12 dB at 50 Hz)
# subsonic filter (15 Hz, 24 dB/octave)
# fuse rating: 30A x 2
Hifonics Hfi1000d $165 Shipped
* New Hifonics HFI1000D HFi Series 1000W Monoblock Class D Car Amplifier
* RMS Power at 4 ohms: 475 watts x 1 chan.
* RMS Power at 2 ohms: 750 watts x 1 chan.
* RMS Power at 1 ohms: 1000 watts x 1 chan.
* Pulse Width Modulated MOSFET power supply
* 80A: fuse Rating
Here are the subs that I'm considering. Which sub would be the better choice? They are all about $110-120 shipped, so price isn't really a factor
Alpine Type R swr 1022d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 2-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar® reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene™ rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting
# frequency response: 24-600 Hz
# power handling: 200-500 watts RMS (250 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,500 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 6-13/16"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-0.8 cu. ft.
# ported box volume: 0.6-1.25 cu. ft.
Alpine Type R swr 1023d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 2-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting and radial finned heat sink
# frequency response: 26-200 Hz
# power handling: 300-600 watts RMS (300 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,800 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 5-7/8"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-1.0 cu. ft.
# ported box volume: 0.8-1.5 cu. ft.
Alpine Type R swr 1042d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 4-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene™ rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting
# frequency response: 26-600 Hz
# power handling: 200-500 watts RMS (250 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,500 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 6-7/8"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-0.8
# ported box volume: 0.6-1.3
Alpine Type R swr 1043d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 4-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting and radial finned heat sink
# frequency response: 26-200 Hz
# power handling: 300-600 watts RMS (300 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,800 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 5-7/8"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-1.0 cu. ft.
# ported box volume: 0.8-1.5 cu. ft.
Thanks, I really appreciate all the advice that you guys can give me.
Joel
I've tried searching for a direct comparison for all three Type R subs (swr 1022, 1023, 1042, 1043) but I have yet to find a thread anywhere on the net. So here goes mine.
I am looking to install a single 10" sub in my 2000 SS camaro.
The enclosure that I'm going to use is an MTX stealth box with .6 cubic feet
I am planning on buying one of these two amps. Which one is the best fit?:
alpine mrp-m500 $150 Shipped
# mono subwoofer car amplifier
# 300 watts RMS x 1 at 4 ohms (500 watts RMS x 1 at 2 ohms)
# variable low-pass filter (50-200 Hz, 24 dB/octave)
# variable bass boost (0-12 dB at 50 Hz)
# subsonic filter (15 Hz, 24 dB/octave)
# fuse rating: 30A x 2
Hifonics Hfi1000d $165 Shipped
* New Hifonics HFI1000D HFi Series 1000W Monoblock Class D Car Amplifier
* RMS Power at 4 ohms: 475 watts x 1 chan.
* RMS Power at 2 ohms: 750 watts x 1 chan.
* RMS Power at 1 ohms: 1000 watts x 1 chan.
* Pulse Width Modulated MOSFET power supply
* 80A: fuse Rating
Here are the subs that I'm considering. Which sub would be the better choice? They are all about $110-120 shipped, so price isn't really a factor
Alpine Type R swr 1022d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 2-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar® reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene™ rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting
# frequency response: 24-600 Hz
# power handling: 200-500 watts RMS (250 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,500 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 6-13/16"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-0.8 cu. ft.
# ported box volume: 0.6-1.25 cu. ft.
Alpine Type R swr 1023d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 2-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting and radial finned heat sink
# frequency response: 26-200 Hz
# power handling: 300-600 watts RMS (300 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,800 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 5-7/8"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-1.0 cu. ft.
# ported box volume: 0.8-1.5 cu. ft.
Alpine Type R swr 1042d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 4-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene™ rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting
# frequency response: 26-600 Hz
# power handling: 200-500 watts RMS (250 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,500 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 6-7/8"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-0.8
# ported box volume: 0.6-1.3
Alpine Type R swr 1043d
# 10" subwoofer with dual 4-ohm voice coils
# Kevlar reinforced pulp cone with Santoprene rubber surround
# cast aluminum frame with perimeter venting and radial finned heat sink
# frequency response: 26-200 Hz
# power handling: 300-600 watts RMS (300 watts per coil)
# peak power: 1,800 watts
# sensitivity: 83 dB
# top-mount depth: 5-7/8"
# sealed box volume: 0.5-1.0 cu. ft.
# ported box volume: 0.8-1.5 cu. ft.
Thanks, I really appreciate all the advice that you guys can give me.
Joel