What is the difference between 12" subs and 15" subs?

im glad im the only one at my office right now, because i just read this and laughed so loud.
i dont know whats funnier, the fact that he thinks he understands something that apparently no one else does, or the fact that he thinks he is right.


Wow. You guys are down right retarded. Arguing with the subwoofer's specs themselves.

 
even his avatar is stupid and can be easily proven wrong.
ROTFLMAO. You can disprove that a circle of the same diamater as a square's 4 sides will always have less area than that of the square? Oh please do.

PLEASE! Make my Day! by disproving this OBVIOUSLY infinetly valid mathematical law that has been accepted since before anyone can remember as "NO-DUH." Please disprove it, I would love for you to. Seriously, you will no doubt win some sort of nobel prize.

Or, you could just close your ****-sucker.

 
Wow. You guys are down right retarded. Arguing with the subwoofer's specs themselves.
you still dont get it... they are individual subwoofer specifications... and you are using them to imply that they are cold hard set in stone facts, when the truth of the matter is just the opposite. hell, even the examples you provided were only marginal examples of the point you were trying to illustrate.

larger cones do NOT play any louder, or lower than smaller cones. those results are controlled by the individual components of the woofers and how they work together. not by the size of the cone.

 
^^^Add to that that manufactures' specs (especially for freq response of speakers and subs) without specifying enclosure, vehicle and relative response level are meaningless. I've seen coax speakers rated 25-20kHz. With those specs, who needs subs. Specs are concrete in your book after all.

 
^^^Add to that that manufactures' specs (especially for freq response of speakers and subs) without specifying enclosure, vehicle and relative response level are meaningless. I've seen coax speakers rated 25-20kHz. With those specs, who needs subs. Specs are concrete in your book after all.
because coax speakers cant handle KW's RMS. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 
ROTFLMAO. You can disprove that a circle of the same diamater as a square's 4 sides will always have less area than that of the square? Oh please do.

PLEASE! Make my Day! by disproving this OBVIOUSLY infinetly valid mathematical law that has been accepted since before anyone can remember as "NO-DUH." Please disprove it, I would love for you to. Seriously, you will no doubt win some sort of nobel prize.

Or, you could just close your ****-sucker.

well if displacement comes in to play

a round woofer can indeed > square woofer even if the square has more cone area..

mtx has a big section on this..

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

96BLKYUKON

10+ year member
Junior Member
Thread starter
96BLKYUKON
Joined
Location
MD
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
342
Views
35,370
Last reply date
Last reply from
GAM3OVR
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top