What does ca.com think?

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

*face palm*
Maybe if you cant grasp how Id not understand your point, its because you dont understand mine? Naw!

And again, 16 states have laws stating it is illegal to refuse hiring someone who is 'addicted' to nicotine. And you've yet to address the fact that nobody, NOBODY, refuses to hire based on drug use (the word drug referring to all/any drugs, including politically correct drugs like caffeine). So you keep on with your 'if there is no law saying its illegal, its legal' rhetoric all you want. The point of this this discussion wasn't even if it was illegal, but if its fair.

Lets boil this down, because your attempts to confuse the issue are tiresome. Do you think its fair to assume that if someone tests positive for marijuana, it should be assumed it will affect their ability to do their job?

You simply refuse to answer if you think its FAIR, dont you? If you are going to refuse, at least say so, instead of falling back on 'they test because its illegal'. We already know they dont/cant/wont test for legal drugs, that is not the point of this thread, our discussion, nor is it even interesting or informational.

You are one pile of fail. Your question was if they test positive for marijuana. I responded if it's legal they wouldn't test it.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Are you retarded? I posted what is illegal. Did you see anything in there that said it's illegal to refuse to hire someone based on their use of legal drugs?

What is your major malfunction?

Lets try this another way...

fair

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

fair?

Am I getting through to you yet? lulz

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

You are one pile of fail. Your question was if they test positive for marijuana. I responded if it's legal they wouldn't test it.

You missed a key word in my question. Gee, I wonder what that word might be... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Second question: can people launch skidoo's off your forehead?

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

What is your major malfunction?
Lets try this another way...

fair

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

FAIR

fair?

Am I getting through to you yet? lulz

Ok so you are completely retarded. Did you not even see the statements I put in nice big bold letters that you made?

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

You missed a key word in my question. Gee, I wonder what that word might be... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Second question: can people launch skidoo's off your forehead?

You are fully retarded. How would a company know someone tested positive for marijuana if it's a legal drug, and they are only testing for illegal drugs?

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Ok so you are completely retarded. Did you not even see the statements I put in nice big bold letters that you made?

You keep calling me retarded, and then completely upfucking the conversation with nonsense. lol

"I responded if it's legal they wouldn't test it."

Explain how its legal status relates to my question of fairness. Is it fair, you fucking moron, legal or not? So you answering "if its legal they wouldnt test it" has absolutely no relevance.

Just tell me if you have downs syndrome, and I'll stop asking about the size of your forehead.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

You are fully retarded. How would a company know someone tested positive for marijuana if it's a legal drug, and they are only testing for illegal drugs?

lol

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

You keep calling me retarded, and then completely upfucking the conversation with nonsense. lol
"I responded if it's legal they wouldn't test it."

Explain how its legal status relates to my question of fairness. Is it fair, you fucking moron, legal or not? So you answering "if its legal they wouldnt test it" has absolutely no relevance.

Just tell me if you have downs syndrome, and I'll stop asking about the size of your forehead.

Your question doesn't make any sense tard. You don't realize that? Look at your question.

Do you think its fair to assume that if someone tests positive for marijuana, it should be assumed it will affect their ability to do their job?

Now you're asking me to answer a different question:

"is it fair to assume that smoking marijuana will affect someone's work performance"

Do you not see the difference in those two questions?

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Your question doesn't make any sense tard. You don't realize that? Look at your question.


Now you're asking me to answer a different question:

"is it fair to assume that smoking marijuana will affect someone's work performance"

Do you not see the difference in those two questions?

OKay, NOW I see the communication error. The light reflecting off your ginormous forehead made you misread, and misquote, what I asked. Let me try again.

Do you think its fair to assume that if someone tests positive for marijuana, it should be assumed it will affect their ability to do their job?

I never asked if you thought smoking pot (ie being under the influence AT WORK) will affect their job performance.

I say again, lol.

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

OKay, NOW I see the communication error. The light reflecting off your ginormous forehead made you misread, and misquote, what I asked. Let me try again.


I never asked if you thought smoking pot (ie being under the influence AT WORK) will affect their job performance.

I say again, lol.

I never said being under the influence at work //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif. I said smoking marijuana. You assumed that meant being high at work. How is that my fault?

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

I never said being under the influence at work //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif. I said smoking marijuana. You assumed that meant being high at work. How is that my fault?

OKay, lets go back to small syllables, because I see you are getting confused again.

"is it fair to assume that smoking marijuana will affect someone's work performance" - what you said I said.

"Do you think its fair to assume that if someone tests positive for marijuana, it should be assumed it will affect their ability to do their job?" - what I actually said.

So if your fucked up quote of what I said is not implying 'at work', what difference between the two questions are you referring to. If you need to google any words I used here, I'll be glad to wait.

Then, after we finish this little detour you've taken us on, you can get back to answering my question you are STILL dodging. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Do you think its fair to assume that if someone tests positive for marijuana, it should be assumed it will affect their ability to do their job?

What's wrong Lazy, too scared to answer it? lulasaurus rex

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

OKay, lets go back to small syllables, because I see you are getting confused again.
"is it fair to assume that smoking marijuana will affect someone's work performance" - what you said I said.

"Do you think its fair to assume that if someone tests positive for marijuana, it should be assumed it will affect their ability to do their job?" - what I actually said.

So if your fucked up quote of what I said is not implying 'at work', what difference between the two questions are you referring to. If you need to google any words I used here, I'll be glad to wait.

Then, after we finish this little detour you've taken us on, you can get back to answering my question you are STILL dodging. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Do you think its fair to assume that if someone tests positive for marijuana, it should be assumed it will affect their ability to do their job?

What's wrong Lazy, too scared to answer it? lulasaurus rex

What you don't understand is that your question implies that marijuana is illegal, but yet you said we're talking about it being legal. That's my point.And let me further explain why this is important. If weed is legal, it would be illegal for me to ask an applicant about their drug use to find out what the extent of their drug use is.

But since you're clearly too dumb to understand that let me just go ahead and answer:

Yes. It's fair to assume that their drug use could effect their work performance.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif

 

[AlterEgo99 5,000+ posts]

omg... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/hilarious.gif.02a037aad04aa96f19982b298a3d70a8.gif

 

[chillin 10+ year member]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rotflol.gif.b453361716769b8110ddefc85ff03cd2.gif

Lazy, how could you possibly think someone that someone using pot while not at work is going to affect thier work performance? You said you have friends that smoke. You should know the effects only last a couple of hours. How could you think its fair to say thier performance will be affected