what do you guys think about war?

Originally posted by LuRp hey, guys! im a fukin moron!.
You already proved that. You have shown that you are quite the *******. I don't think anyone here likes you, and I know you will probably say that you don't care that no one likes you, but you know you do;)
 
Originally posted by Brock how do you figure?
He doesn't figure, Brock.. He's apparently never taken any real science courses or psychology courses..

To hear this guy say it, being a Gym teacher takes the same smarts as it does to be a college physics professor.. I mean, after all, they are both teachers, right?

He's not even bright enough to realize I'm not picking on spelling.. we all make spelling mistakes, I'm pointing out his shitty grammer and seeming lack of understanding of the language (just like I had to define "leader" and "great" to him)..

 
Originally posted by LuRp well, other than that, you got anything else to prove to me that you're not an *******?

Nope.. not trying to prove to you I'm not an *******.. when it comes to dillholes like you, I am very much an *******.. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
Originally posted by Savant He doesn't figure, Brock.. He's apparently never taken any real science courses or psychology courses..

 

To hear this guy say it, being a Gym teacher takes the same smarts to be a college physics professor.. I mean, after all, they are both teachers, right?

 

He's not even bright enough to realize I'm not picking on spelling.. we all make spelling mistakes, I'm pointing out his shitty grammer and seeming lack of understanding of the language (just like I had to define "leader" and "great" to him)..
Savant...he's too stubborn to realize when he's pretty much been taken care of in this matter...you know hes gonna come back and say something dumb and offensive, then counter with "I'm done with this thread."
 
yeah, i really don't care fellas.

I know you guys are fools. Savant is still just pissed about my posts from earlier. The posts that ripped him apart. Understandable, it's not easy getting ripped apart. It hurts, and I pretty much made you look like an ******* in front of all the car audio guys. With the exception of the "precieous few" prodigy's that follow you around like a puppy. Keep on trying. My chops are un-bustable.

Savant I must give you this. You are by FAR the smartest of the group here. (with the exception of me ofcourse)

 
Originally posted by LuRp yeah, i really don't care fellas.

 

 

I you guys are fools. You guys dont but thats because you area all fools. Savant is still just pissed about my posts from earlier. The posts that ripped him apart. Understandable, it's not easy getting ripped apart. It hurts, and I pretty much made you look like an ******* in front of all the car audio guys. With the exception of the "precieous few" prodigy's that follow you around like a puppy. Keep on trying. My chops are un-bustable.

 

Savant I must give you this. You are by FAR the smartest of the group here. (with the exception of me ofcourse)
Lol..see, I told you he'd post something like this...Lurp, you are too predictable...go do something else with your time then waste it here...
 
Lurp wouldn't know his arse from the hole-in-the-ground he crawled out of. I read his posts and found absolutely nothing of any substance, The guy has the IQ of a marsh-mellow.

Lurp is probably right, in some small, insignificant way he his smarter than us, he just hasn't shown anyone on this board in what way (I do maintain that no one is wholey (is that a word?) stupid, but many are mostly stupid). Certainly not with his arguments, his claims about psychology, or calling people morons. When you resort to name calling, you show that you have lost an argument but won't stop arguing.

P.S. How is psychology not a psuedo science? Although I don't know the exact deffinition of psuedo, I know it basically means (in this context), uncertain, based on little to no fact, not 100% correct. Now as I know psychology, what applies to one person in psychology, does not (more often than not) mean it will apply to everyone. Psuedo science. Now Physics, Chemistry, electronics, etc. are all exact sciences, of which you probably know nothing.

 
Originally posted by CarAudioAddict Lurp wouldn't know his arse from the hole-in-the-ground he crawled out of. I read his posts and found absolutely nothing of any substance, The guy has the IQ of a marsh-mellow.

 

Lurp is probably right, in some small, insignificant way he his smarter than us, he just hasn't shown anyone on this board in what way (I do maintain that no one is wholey (is that a word?) stupid, but many are mostly stupid). Certainly not with his arguments, his claims about psychology, or calling people morons. When you resort to name calling, you show that you have lost an argument but won't stop arguing.

 

P.S. How is psychology not a psuedo science? Although I don't know the exact deffinition of psuedo, I know it basically means (in this context), uncertain, based on little to no fact, not 100% correct. Now as I know psychology, what applies to one person in psychology, does not (more often than not) mean it will apply to everyone. Psuedo science. Now Physics, Chemistry, electronics, etc. are all exact sciences, of which you probably know nothing.
Yes.. Pseudo means "almost but not quite".. in the sense that, you can form generalizations or have a "pretty good idea" about something.. but 'exact' sicence says that if I apply X pounds of pressure to your heart you will die.. where psychology says, if your father beat you as a child, you "might" be an abusive adult.. Or, more to the point simpletons like to take it... if you are "abusive" in your adult dealings, you were most likely beat by your father as a child.. Hmm.. and that plays a part to kids from a home where the father was missing for a few decades?... That's what makes it "pseudo".. you can 'kind of tell' where someone 'might' be from based on how they act, but that in NO way gaurentees how they will be in 'the future'.. *shrug*

But, I can calculate 2^2 exactly EVERY time.. Math is part of a 'real' science.. If I split 'atom' X, it will yield Y newtons of force.. gaurenteed.. ... your mom aboused you as a kid.. you "will" be a rapest and serial killer? no gaurentee.. not even close to a direct correlation..

But, you DO notice that he hasn't posted in response to thtat rebuttal, but just mentioned that I was 'smarter' than the base of the group, and tried to retain his superiority over me (smartest in the group, but not smarter than him.. he said).. course, that just means he is admitting that I have bested him, but doesn't want to admit that he can't compete with others here..

He STILL has NOT offered ONE statement to contradict ANYTHING I have said, but he maintains he 'took me apart'? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

AAAANNNNNNNYYYYYYYYYWWWWWWWHHHHHHHHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

This poor guy has hung his dick in the wind long enough.. we should all say a little prayer to what ever it is you pray to. Wish him some guidence in his pathetic little life.. Someone that has nothing better to do with their lives than come here and pick a fight isn't someone without issues.. and for that we should try and help him... *shrug* just my thoughts.. (mind you, I'm in one of my generous moods.. normally I'd say fuk em.. but.. with so much suffering in the world...)

 
p.s.

psychology is a soft science, not a psuedo science..

If you look up the etymology of the word psuedo, it means flase. Psychology is not false, Astrology is, its not 100% testable, i will give you that much.

But there is a difference between psuedo and soft.

Ok, now you can have the last word.

Enjoy your dream.

 
Originally posted by LuRp p.s.

 

psychology is a soft science, not a psuedo science..

 

If you look up the etymology of the word psuedo, it means flase. Psychology is not false, Astrology is, its not 100% testable, i will give you that much.

 

But there is a difference between psuedo and soft.

 

 

Ok, now you can have the last word.

 

 

Enjoy your dream.
Not that I really want the last word.. but..

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pseudo about 1/3 the way down.. there is this as a valid definition of pseudo..

pseudo

adj : (often used in combination) not genuine but having the appearance of; "a pseudo esthete"; "pseudoclassic" n : a person who makes deceitful pretenses [syn: imposter, impostor, pretender, fake, faker, fraud, sham, pseud, role player]

so.. not 'science' but has the appearance of science.. pseudo..

Yes, 'soft' applies as well though..

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=soft

number 10..

10. Using or based on data that is not readily quantifiable or amenable to experimental verification or refutation: The lawyer downplayed the soft evidence.

So.. once again you have NOT managed to disprove my statement.. You had me concerened for a second.. wasn't positive that I had heared pseudo applied to psychology.. and when I think about it, I do think I've heard it refered to in both contexts.. pseudo and soft.. But, again.. trying to split semantic hairs is pretty much pointless..

K.. now post something so you get the last word.. I really don't want it, but can't let you make implications that aren't founded //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

mamey69

10+ year member
Quiero Cerveza!!
Thread starter
mamey69
Joined
Location
Guaymas, Son, Mexico
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
314
Views
7,111
Last reply date
Last reply from
Savant
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top