What annoys the ***** outta you/pisses you off...

[SlugButter]

More reasons I'm a liberal who doesn't support liberals. They switched sides on me.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

That didn't happen. There is video of it. Where did you hear that BS? One guy had a pistol that he fired at the kid, one guy was grabbing for his rifle and trying to take while threatening to kill him and the other guy was attacking with a skateboard. I can already hear MSNBC pvssies who never go into a serious fight in their lives claim that a skateboard isn’t a lethal weapon, to which I call BS. I could fvck someone up with a skateboard and so could you.

The testimony in the trial. I don't post shit that I can't prove. I don't make shitt up.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

So you are on the side of corrupt DA and police charging crimes that didn't happen and big insurance corporations. I don't like who you support I guess

Where in the World did you come up with all of that? What do you mean crimes that didn't happen? If they didn't happen then there shouldn't be any proof and the person will be found not guilty or the case(s) will be dismissed.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

Youtube no longer shows number of dislikes.... Pathetic.

View attachment 33598

People who dislike shit are pathetic.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

Fact - He shot people
Fact - The people he shot were aggressive towards him
Fact - One person hit him twice in the head with a skateboard. (These are made from metal and wood parts)
Fact - One person pointed a pistol at him at close range
Fact - He was pursued by multiple persons
Fact - People were telling other people to "Get Him!!"

He was there to help protect a business. There is NO LAW against that. He was also there to help people. There is NO LAW against that. People became aggressive towards him when he began protecting property. Property that was being damaged criminally. In the act of fleeing from aggressors he was FORCED to protect himself with what he had. Had he not been armed and he began protecting property and was then chased after by these criminals, chances are he would have been beaten by the crowd of CRIMINAL BLM rioters just like many others in other cities that crossed paths with these criminal BLM thugs.

I saw the bicep of the idiot who pointed the pistol at Kyle as it was blown apart in unedited and uncensored pictures. It was gnarly and I thought it was funny as hell. You say Kyle hit some chick... sometimes you gotta slap a hoe. You don't know the context of why he was hitting that person. If it was a girl, maybe she struck his sister... yeah, I'd have hit her too. Don't sit there and act like your morals are above all others. There is a time and a place for everything. Women and men are both humans and if a woman wants to be aggressive then she accepts that she might get whooped. I have had my asss handed to me by a woman. Nobody gave her crap about kicking a mans asss. It's sexist to think they can't get an equal asss whoopin`. By the by, I ended up dating the one who whooped me.

Hot damn, best thing you've said in awhile

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

I support the 2A fully. It’s in the COTUS. Stop living by your feelings, beliefs, or opinions.

Kyle was illegally armed. If he had not been breaking the law, no one would have been attempting to beat him after he shot an unarmed man.

Who hired him to protect this used car lot, and was he on the property when the shooting occurred ?
Was he licensed to carry a gun?
Why did he use deadly force against an unarmed man who did not touch him (per his testimony)?

Lots of errors here bro. Lots. So people only attack people that are breaking the law? Man that woman that got ***** in the subways must of really done some egregious shit. He was only illegally armed if Wisconsin law states that an AR isn't a hunting weapon. And it doesn't. Wisconsin is an open carry state and you do not need a license or permit. When is this place going to be changed to The Forum of Lies and Misinformation, No Matter the Subject.

 

[SlugButter]

Where in the World did you come up with all of that? What do you mean crimes that didn't happen? If they didn't happen then there shouldn't be any proof and the person will be found not guilty or the case(s) will be dismissed.

It was easy to come up with. First you claimed that insurance companies worth billions were the ones hurting from the riots, not the businesses that actually burned down. Then you falsely claimed a 17 year old shot someone in the back and should be charged with reckless homicide. No one shot anyone in the back. You’re on the side of the oppressors and don’t even know it. That’s our society right now in a nutshell. Idiots who think social media is real life. You and people like you are dangerous to a free and open society.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

I think you all should let the jury decide the case and stop arguing

I think that the people here are BEYOND stupid and should just STFU period. I have never come across a place so ignorant in my entire life. No one here ever has a f*cking clue of what they are talking about. It's absolutely mind blowing. I really need to find something better to do with my time because being associated with this place is f*cking embarrassing.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

Its all Trumps fault bro

I'm betting on a hung jury on every charge except the gun possession charge.

He should of never been charged with that period. Not sure what y'all don't get about that

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

He’s obviously guilty of gun possession and being an idiot. It was still self defense though. If it were a black man, he may not get the same representation in court, but that won’t change by just convicting a white kid for murder out of spite.

Again he is not obviously guilty of gun possession. Please tell me why he is guilty of having a gun. Please

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

F*cking morons.

 

[SlugButter]

Again he is not obviously guilty of gun possession. Please tell me why he is guilty of having a gun. Please

He was 17 when he had someone purchase it. Had he been 18, he would’ve been fine. They’re going to get him on a misdemeanor gun charge.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

He was 17 when he had someone purchase it. Had he been 18, he would’ve been fine. They’re going to get him on a misdemeanor gun charge.

It's not illegal for a minor to own a gun bro. How many times do I have to say that. Not even in Wisconsin

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

It's like y'all just make up shit and are like,well that's what I believe so that makes it true.

 

[SlugButter]

It's not illegal for a minor to own a gun bro. How many times do I have to say that. Not even in Wisconsin

I’m going by what lawyers predict will happen. I didn’t specifically look up Wisconsin gun laws, granted. I am not going to even look it up either. I will just wait for you to post and let me know your expertise in Wisconsin gun law..