What annoys the ***** outta you/pisses you off...

I guess you better go to law school and become a prosecuting attorney. You got alllllllll the answers. Like the answer on how the dumbasss that got shot while pointing a pistol at Kyle was "protecting" the person who got shot before him... how exactly was this person "protecting" dead man?
Prosecution is part of what I do for a living.

Protecting others from Kyle. Unless the dead man was the only one there? Oh yeah, there were multiple people.
Kyle shoots unarmed man dead. That makes him a credible threat to others. Pistol guy would have been within his rights to put as many needed COM to stop the credible threat if Kyle was still holding the rifle.
 
Prosecution is part of what I do for a living.

Protecting others from Kyle. Unless the dead man was the only one there? Oh yeah, there were multiple people.
Kyle shoots unarmed man dead. That makes him a credible threat to others. Pistol guy would have been within his rights to put as many needed COM to stop the credible threat if Kyle was still holding the rifle.
Sooooooooooooooooooooooo libertard 2nd amendment abolitionist.... Kyle should have let these people beat him? Possibly to death right?
 
So after this idiot attacked Kyle and Kyle began to defend himself by shooting, the aggressor now turned coward turned to escape the bullets... but like everything else he attempted in life, failed.

The guy never put his hands on Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse even admitted it during the trial. Do you do any research or is that my job to do your research?
 
The guy never put his hands on Rittenhouse. Rittenhouse even admitted it during the trial. Do you do any research or is that my job to do your research?
So this guy was just standing there waiting to be shot in the back? I am asking because the other two people he shot were chasing him and attempting to harm him. The guy you are speaking of was the first guy shot, correct?
 
Prosecution is part of what I do for a living.

Protecting others from Kyle. Unless the dead man was the only one there? Oh yeah, there were multiple people.
Kyle shoots unarmed man dead. That makes him a credible threat to others. Pistol guy would have been within his rights to put as many needed COM to stop the credible threat if Kyle was still holding the rifle.
Sooooooooooooooooooooooo libertard 2nd amendment abolitionist.... Kyle should have let these people beat him? Possibly to death right?
I support the 2A fully. It’s in the COTUS. Stop living by your feelings, beliefs, or opinions.

Kyle was illegally armed. If he had not been breaking the law, no one would have been attempting to beat him after he shot an unarmed man.

Who hired him to protect this used car lot, and was he on the property when the shooting occurred ?
Was he licensed to carry a gun?
Why did he use deadly force against an unarmed man who did not touch him (per his testimony)?
 
So this guy was just standing there waiting to be shot in the back? I am asking because the other two people he shot were chasing him and attempting to harm him. The guy you are speaking of was the first guy shot, correct?

Yes. If Rittenhouse had any athletic ability then he wouldn't have tripped running down the street and the other two guys wouldn't have been shot. In fact, if he would've stayed at the scene of the first shooting and administered aid then the other two guys wouldn't have been shot either. He was there to administer aid to injured people right? That's what he said he was there for since he was a certified EMT. Why didn't he call the Police and tell them that he just shot somebody? Why in the World would he call his buddy other than to brag about it?
 
I support the 2A fully. It’s in the COTUS. Stop living by your feelings, beliefs, or opinions.

Kyle was illegally armed. If he had not been breaking the law, no one would have been attempting to beat him after he shot an unarmed man.

Who hired him to protect this used car lot, and was he on the property when the shooting occurred ?
Was he licensed to carry a gun?
They began to harass him when he tried to put out the fire in the dumpster. They did not attack him because he was armed. He was trying to keep the people who were actually committing crimes from burning down yet another city. Like I said, it would apparently be ok with you if he was unarmed and beat to death for trying to stop these criminals. I am sure you were just as ok with all the looting and crimes that happened "in the name of George Floyd" too huh.
 
Yes. If Rittenhouse had any athletic ability then he wouldn't have tripped running down the street and the other two guys wouldn't have been shot. In fact, if he would've stayed at the scene of the first shooting and administered aid then the other two guys wouldn't have been shot either. He was there to administer aid to injured people right? That's what he said he was there for since he was a certified EMT. Why didn't he call the Police and tell them that he just shot somebody? Why in the World would he call his buddy other than to brag about it?
So if he didn't trip then the guy hitting him with the skateboard wouldn't have been trying to hit him? Huh? The guy with the Glock wouldn't have pointed the gun at him? So, because he is not "athletic" he is at fault... huh?
 
The kid is white and will probably walk with a slap on the wrist. If he was black then he would probably get life without parole. I have no doubt about that. It's sad to say but that is the World that we currently live in.
 
They began to harass him when he tried to put out the fire in the dumpster. They did not attack him because he was armed. He was trying to keep the people who were actually committing crimes from burning down yet another city. Like I said, it would apparently be ok with you if he was unarmed and beat to death for trying to stop these criminals. I am sure you were just as ok with all the looting and crimes that happened "in the name of George Floyd" too huh.
Answer my questions, if you would.
They speak directly to the situation and the legality of what he did.
 
Why, what's the point. You avoid questions. I can too. Oh wait... your questions are all rhetorical. I am off to bed.
You won’t answer because the answers indicate Kyle was in the wrong.

He should not have been in Kenosha.
He was illegally armed.
He was never hired to protect the car lot.
He was not even on the property he claimed he was hired to defend.
He was not facing threat of great bodily harm but responded with deadly force.

None of those facts bode well for him after killing two and wounding a third.
 
That DA actually had one of his own witnesses accuse them of trying to get him to change his statement. His own witness said he was uncomfortable about that on the stand in court. Then he brought up the defendant’s right to remain silent and tried to use that against him in court, which every crackhead in the ghetto knows that’s unconstitutional. Even if the jury finds the defendant guilty, it’s a mistrial. How many of you are actually paying attention to the case and not getting your information off Facebook or MSM? That DA fvcked this case up in a big big way. He should lose his job honestly.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Boomin_tahoe

5,000+ posts
Hurtin' feelings errrday.
Thread starter
Boomin_tahoe
Joined
Location
WA
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
4,584
Views
279,090
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThxOne
IMG_20260506_140749.jpg

74eldiablo

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
design.jpeg

WNCTracker

    May 22, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top