Thinking of going from 12s to 10s

thanks for the well thought-out response.

sounds like we are in agreement on just about everything... it's just the semantics of "efficiency", which doesn't matter. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

i agree that the subs "see" about 2/3 of the enclosure in a common chamber, so you do save a lot of space. and i prefer a well tuned enclosure of proper size over cramming separate enclosures that are too small. i also like that, if properly designed, the rear waves are coherent in the port. granted, this requires each sub is the same distance from the port opening. easy to do with 2, difficult if not impossible with more than 2.

i feel that port placement in common chamber designs is critical as it affects pathlength for each sub. you want the rear wave from each sub to combine in-phase (coherently) in the common port.

i see this neglected in some designs. i'm not sure that software even takes it into consideration.

thanks for the intelligent discussion. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

skatingrocker17

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
skatingrocker17
Joined
Location
Ohio
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
17
Views
2,373
Last reply date
Last reply from
skatingrocker17
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top