THE OFFICAL 911 was a inside job thread

[Lil Poot 5,000+ posts]

380 claims to be exact.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1223-02.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-07-13-911-families-cover-usat_x.htm

maybe they failed because it was a us federal court? possibly?

 

[fancynapkin 10+ year member]

380 claims to be exact.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/1223-02.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-07-13-911-families-cover-usat_x.htm

maybe they failed because it was a us federal court? possibly?

Your article is 4 years old //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

Im going to say one last thing to your dumbass, if you are going to attempt to claim that the US government purposely murdered 3000 of its own citizens, you better have evidence thats made out of ****ing gold, and you dont.

Your paranoid and ignorent, grow up.

 

[Lil Poot 5,000+ posts]

lmfao it being 4 years old means that it never happened? it did happen. hundreds of the families of the 9/11 victims were appalled by the official investigation and sued. they wanted a real investigation and they never got it.

i never said i had proof made out of gold, what i said what i have quite a bit more evidence supporting what i believe than you have supporting what you believe.

anyone else find it ironic a 17 year old is telling me to grow up?

 

[fancynapkin 10+ year member]

lmfao it being 4 years old means that it never happened? it did happen. hundreds of the families of the 9/11 victims were appalled by the official investigation and sued. they wanted a real investigation and they never got it.
i never said i had proof made out of gold, what i said what i have quite a bit more evidence supporting what i believe than you have supporting what you believe.

anyone else find it ironic a 17 year old is telling me to grow up?

More reasearch has been done since 2003 genius, and just becuase someone sues, doesnt make them right. I can sue you for raping me, so it must have happened, right?

And no amount of crappy google videos and paranoid ramblings makes MIT structural engineers and eye witnesses wrong.

Im actually 19, but my guess is you looked in my profile to see if I was employed by the government, right? Maturity isnt measured by age, its measured by what you say, in that sense your practically an infant.

 

[Lil Poot 5,000+ posts]

i notice you never tried to address any of the issues brought up in this link.

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

so ill give you another link full of points you can try and address.

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/571-page-lie.htm

i ask you, who brought 6 of the 19 hijackers back from the dead, AFTER their passports were found, uncharred and perfectly intact next to the world trade centers?

oh wait, i forgot. you said i WAS DONE numerous times. that completely debunks all of this.

 

[project f-150 10+ year member]

Honestly I would give up on arguing with the napkin kid. I Started to go through this a little while back and instead of actually trying to answer any claims I made he would just drop a personal attack on my character. I quickly realized he is far to cloed minded to actually try to look at things and understand them from your point of view to make an informed response. He instead likes to just repeat his same lame as facts that can be easily countered if he would just take a second to open his eyes. Yes the facts that support the "conspiracy theorists" can be wrong. But so can the facts going the other way.

 

[fancynapkin 10+ year member]

Honestly I would give up on arguing with the napkin kid. I Started to go through this a little while back and instead of actually trying to answer any claims I made he would just drop a personal attack on my character. I quickly realized he is far to cloed minded to actually try to look at things and understand them from your point of view to make an informed response. He instead likes to just repeat his same lame as facts that can be easily countered if he would just take a second to open his eyes. Yes the facts that support the "conspiracy theorists" can be wrong. But so can the facts going the other way.

I love how you guys ignore any facts I post because I "hurt your feelings", guess what, pointing out your fallacies and false logic are all the attacks I need.

Listen 1meangta, the BYU proffessor has been posted for the third time, Ive posted my argument twice, your going in circles.

If you guys are going to claim the US killed 3000 of its own civilians, please have more evidence than the opinion of a nuclear physicist.

What you guys are doing, although you might not realize it, is disrespectful and deleterious on many levels.

and proj f-150, Im sorry your still sore after your spanking, but unless you have anything to contribute besides your own personal hatred for me, go away.

 

[fancynapkin 10+ year member]

I see now that it was my mistake, I should never have tried to argue with people that are insane.

 

[eisenhower 10+ year member]

Look at me! I can search for 9-11 conspiracies on google and post links! Im so clever! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 

[btmorris972 10+ year member]

That fire must have been realy hot. lol

wtc7 was 300' away from the north tower.

I just cant believe that fire did this.

 

[fancynapkin 10+ year member]

That fire must have been realy hot. lol
wtc7 was 300' away from the north tower.

I just cant believe that fire did this.

MIT structural engineers apparrently do...

but what do they know //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

give up already.

 

[wilzyx 5,000+ posts]

if you read any of the links i posted, it would tell you that the only way for a plane to make a manuveur over 1.5g's is for it to be overriden by computers on the ground and remote piloted. when the planes hit the towers and pentagon, they all made manuveur's from 5-7 g's. and the government says they found the terrorists passports on the ground? how the **** can anyone actually believe that. the fire can take down this giant skyscraper with ease but cant burn a little paper booklet?

 

[btmorris972 10+ year member]

This is the Windsor Building in Madrid. It did not collapse.

 

[Slammed 5,000+ posts]

no way you can convince the other side when they are so focused with being right!

 

[Lil Poot 5,000+ posts]

he makes no attempt to respond to any of the FACTS. like the FACT that boeing 757 and 767 CANNOT pull over 1.5 (i thought it was 2) times the force of gravity and that these planes were caught on radar pulling 3 times that. he says that we're idiots, we're insane, and we're done. and we're supposed to forget the MOUNDS of evidence we've seen.

hey *******, instead of being a total douchebag and TALKING IN CIRCLES how about posting something that explains away any of what we're saying? oh yeah, it's a nuclear physicist discussing BASIC laws of physics... but hes a nuclear physicist, they dont know anything about physics.... and the government said...

if you're going to be so ****in ignorant and hardheaded that you won't even review what the man is saying, you just say "oh hes a nuclear physicist, and THESE people said..." or even ATTEMPT to debate ANY of the points he makes, im not going to argue with you any longer. for gods sake you never even attempted to explain what silverstein meant by "we made the decision to pull the building." what do you make of that statement? why did al-queda warn san franciscos mayor, along with numerous other politicians not to fly on THAT PARTICULAR DAY? why did they warn people not to go to work in the world trade centers that day? how did they get away with making millions in stock options placed 2 weeks prior to sept 11 that were 5-10 times the normal amount of those particular options? let me know when you want to talk about REAL points.