THE OFFICAL 911 was a inside job thread

Was 911 an inside job?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 94 47.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 86 43.7%
  • Not sure yet but I will visit <a href="http://www.UniversalSeed.org" rel="external nofollow">http://

    Votes: 17 8.6%

  • Total voters
    197
Status
Not open for further replies.
didnt realize im not allowed to have an opinion. im not the one being an *** to anyone that disagrees with him.
Excuse me, Eisenhower is the one being a complete *** and I'm not the only one in the thread that feels that way. You didn't bring him up because you're just as right-wing ignorant as he is so its ok for him.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 
yes, i do like bush i think he's done a decent job with the hand he's been dealt. I also think he was the better choice of the 2 choices we had for office. If i felt the democratic candidate was better suited for the job i would have voted that way as well, but that doesnt make me a right winger, i consider myself neither right or left. but then again i dont live my life classifying people based on political views. nor do i feel the need to harass and attempt to belittle anyone that believes differently than myself. but i guess that happens when you have a life and have better things to worry about than every minute detail that goes on in the life of every single corrupt politition. just because you believe differently than myself doesnt mean your any more right than i am. what you are arguing in this thread is merely opinion, which is based on any number of variables and events in a persons life. so as i said, your opinion is no more valid than mine. so please, stop all this childish bickering and find something better to do with your spare time.

 
yes, i do like bush i think he's done a decent job with the hand he's been dealt. I also think he was the better choice of the 2 choices we had for office.
Wrong on both accounts.

If i felt the democratic candidate was better suited for the job i would have voted that way as well, but that doesnt make me a right winger, i consider myself neither right or left.
BS, you're as right wing as they get. You would vote for any Republican that ran for office and you know it. That BS may work on some but not me. But if you want to go through life with blinders on go ahead.

 
Wrong on both accounts.


BS, you're as right wing as they get. You would vote for any Republican that ran for office and you know it. That BS may work on some but not me. But if you want to go through life with blinders on go ahead.
im not going to debate your opinion vs my opinion on bush vs kerry

if i would vote for any republican i suppose i would have voted for bill lafortune for mayor of tulsa instead of kathy taylor right? but as i said, your childish banter will not work. all i ask is that if you dis agree w/ someone dont be an *** about it. and stop w/ the stupid name calling. just because i dont agree with you doesnt make me stupid. it makes me able to form my own opinion which again, is no less valid than yours.

 
Democrat is a party, liberalism is a school of thought, if you vote democrat, you are democratic, the majority of liberals vote democratic, therefore the majority of liberals are democrat; there, Ive resorted to spelling it out for you. Whats your point anyways, other than failing at proving anything?
This is EXACTLY why I said I wouldnt argue politics with you a few posts back, I knew you dont have the logic to carry one out.

Since most liberals vote democrat, most liberals ARE democrats?! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif What dont you understand about a two party system? In our politics, we have democrats and republicans. They are the ONLY two major parties which have any shot at the presidency. Now, say that I liked an independent candidate for president and I'm a liberal. What do I do? I can either 'throw my vote away' by voting for that independent, or make use of it by voting for the lesser of the two evils candidate that has a shot at winning (the democrat). So, according to you, that makes me a democrat? Gimme a break... There are plenty of political scientists who discuss these topics in depth (if you're up to reading out of a book).

 
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2006/200606scientificanalysis.htm

Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries

Steven Jones' analysis on WTC steel about to be released

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | June 20 2006

Scientific analysis on WTC steel debris undertaken by BYU Professor Steven Jones proves that the twin towers were demolished by means of incendiary devices and the release of the conclusive evidence is imminent.

The material that was first brought into question on the back of photos and video clips of the twin towers showing a dripping molten substance and floating white ash can now be confirmed as being thermate, combining thermite which is used as an incendiary device to bring down structures and sulfur, which cuts through steel quicker and leaves a yellow residue.

Pools of molten yellow metal were also found underneath both towers and Building 7 subsequent to the collapses.

"The evidence points directly to controlled demolition which means an inside job brought these World Trade Center buildings down," Jones told radio host Alex Jones in a video interview.

Jones says that, "using advanced techniques we're finding out what's in these samples - we're finding iron, sulphur, potassium and manganese - these are characteristic of a variation of thermite which is used to cut through steel very rapidly, it's called thermate."

"In order to have thermite in these buildings in this way, to help bring the buildings down, that means that thermite had to be planted in the buildings which of course implies directly and inside job - someone had to have access into the buildings," said Jones.

Jones' has conducted over 40 peer reviewed scientific studies two of which were published in Nature and Scientific American.

Prison Planet.tv members can click here to watch a clip of Professor Jones explaining his findings. Subscribe by clicking here.

This facet of the 9/11 truth movement was first brought to light during a November 2005 appearance on The Alex Jones Show by Brigham Young University physicist Professor Steven Jones. Jones said that white phosphorous wasn't powerful enough to cause the implosion but that thermite was the likely culprit. Alex Jones's 2005 release Martial Law 9/11 Rise of the Police State highlighted the physical evidence that the towers and Building 7 were brought down with incendiary devices.

Jones stated that thermite was a "clever" choice because its ingredients, aluminum and iron oxide do not require identifying tags by law, meaning they couldn't be traced back to their manufacturers.

Watch the following video and observe how thermite completely melts a car engine in a matter of seconds, without the addition of sulphur, and also completely resists neutralization by liquid nitrogen. Notice how the dripping substance is identical to that seen in the south tower video.

The following video highlights the fact that steaming hot molten metal was still being found at the World Trade Center site six weeks after the attack.

Jones also, "cited video pictures showing white ash rising from the south tower near the dripping, liquefied metal. When thermite burns, Jones said, it releases aluminum-oxide ash. The presence of both yellow-white molten iron and aluminum oxide ash "are signature characteristics of a thermite reaction," he said."

American Free Press writer Christopher Bollyn discusses evidence of thermite used to sever the twin tower's steel support columns in the picture below.

"In this photo, for example, the column directly above the fireman's helmet shows that it was cut with thermite. There is a substantial amount of hardened molten iron which can be seen on both the inside and outside of the box column. This is precisely what one would expect to find on a column which had been cut with thermite," says Bollyn.

White flames consistent with how thermite reacts producing molten iron and aluminum oxide are also visible in this photograph at the corner of the 81st floor of the south tower.

The USGS Spectroscopy Lab produced images which showed dense thermal hot spots days and weeks after the attacks. ABC News reported that, "the temperature at the core of "the pile," is near 2000 degrees Fahrenheit, according to fire officials, who add that the fires are too deep for firefighters to get to."

The public release of Professor Jones' scientific analysis is imminent - watch this space for the story as soon as it breaks.

 
Set on having this admin fail??? They've already failed. They've failed all of us. You're just too blind to realize it.
As far as 911 is concerned, there are too many UNANSWERED questions to call this hoax theory outlandish.
Simple truth= This administration has failed time and time again. "We hope to be out of Iraq soon" "We had no idea 9/11 could happen" "We don't know where Osama is"

1-They just rejected a bill to set a date to get rid of iraq.

2-There were reports pre-9/11 of a hijacking, also, there were manuveurs conducted by OUR government for situations such as 9/11

3-Osama was in the United States just days before 9/11. He has been on the FBI's list for years now, and if we really wanted to catch him, we would have then, plain and simple.

You probally got real upset when zarqawi was killed, your to set on having this administration fail than to see whats good for America. Thats why your brainwashed. Its completely reasonable to object to this war, as long as you dont say outlandish crap like claim 9/11 was a hoax.
You don't find it funny that the zarqawi story was changed twice? How is sending our people over to Iraq to invade their country FOR REASONS THEY CANNOT EVEN GIVE, WHAT IS THE CURRENT REASON WE ARE THERE????? TERRORISM? NORTH KOREA, HELLO!!

If terrorism is such a threat, how come it has only reared it's head once Bush got into office? How come we are now putting bases in countries that have oil? How come oil companies are showing record profits since Bush has been president? How come more laws giving gas companies tax breaks have been passed since Bush has been in office?

If 9/11 wasn't a hoax, then where is the rest of the plane from the pentagon? If it crashed where it was supposed to, the engines would be 10 ft in the ground, plain and simple.

You don't find it odd at all that since 9/11 oil companies have posted vast profits, our rights have been taken away, and we are slowly closing our borders?

If you think everyone that is against the war wants us to lose then you're even more brainwashed by the right then I thought you were. You are spewing the same shit Hannity and O'Reilley spew out on a daily basis. The whole "with us or against us" attitude was created by the bush admin. to basically say that we should NOT have a voice on the war but to show unconditional support for the president just because he's the president. Well, guess what?? A democracy is about the people having a voice. You're a hopeless little moron who needs to stop listening to your daddy and quit the "young republicans" club tomorrow and open your eyes FOR REAL and see what is really going on right now.
Exactly. The "With us or against us" method was what the Nazi's used. Any similiarity to the current administration?

Lets see, Hitler bombs his capitol and blames it on the Jews so he can exterminate them and invade other countries, whilst taking away the people's rights and liberties. Bush pulls 9/11, invades Iraq and Afghanistan and takes away our rights with the Patriot Act.

Hmmmm....

And yes, being liberal means being a democrat, dont kid yourself, an overwhelming number of liberals vote democratic. Being an anti-american deafist who conjures up silly conspiracies fits in a whole different realm. Those people probally think socialism can still work.
Wow. Just wow. You must watch a whole lot of CNN. You do realize all news stations are owned by three main companies,which are all friends to Bush, don't you? CNN/Fox News are basically propaganda machines.There is no more news. Watch "Outfoxed", if you disagree with me on this, then you are clearly brainwashed to the fullest extent. Any intelligent individual, wether they believe the 9/11 theories or not, will recognize that all these "news" stations are simply a propaganda machine, and do no form of journalism at all.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Crown_amps

Banned
Thread starter
Crown_amps
Joined
Location
British Columbia
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
2,298
Views
34,335
Last reply date
Last reply from
Imtjnotu
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top