you mean a bottom feeding one note wonder with no range?that's why it's a SUBwoofer![]()
I never said it sounded bad. The OP said it wasnt good enough for him. The mag has had better review...that is what I said.For real, he always talks about how bad the Q is and how it doesnt match up to the Mag by anymeans... I heard DJ mans 9515's tonight, and those sounded awesome! I can't imagine how good the 9100's sound....
i liked them. i think they are a good sounding woofer, but dont have that really natural sounding bass. i had trouble getting them to take the abuse of being in my boat with like 1400 watts at full tilt and no down time.Me likey TDX subs //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif
O RLY?I never said it sounded bad. The OP said it wasnt good enough for him. The mag has had better review...that is what I said.
NOW. You where correct. I talked to the kid who ran the DD's, thay where 9500's. I thought they where 9100's. My Mistake. Because they all look alike I ASSumed the other installs I had heard where the same. I do have a habit of doing that. Agian, my mistake.
Q sounds that bad, by bad you ment DD.9100's can sound decent...but if the Q wasnt good enough for him I doubt the DD will...I wouldnt think the Q sounds that bad.