Sound quality

Status
Not open for further replies.
I taught myself how to design, build, and repair computers, and I am in ITT Tech going for a Bachelor's of Science major in Information Systems Security, so I know how computers work. Also, you need to read up on Autism and how it affects people. Do that, then I will let you laugh in my face about having supersensitive hearing.

 
lawl at ITT Tech.

Computer Science at UF > ITT Tech and UF isnt even known for its computer science and engineering.

Seriously, if you cant hear the difference between CD and compressed 64kbps your hearing isnt sensetive, it's almost gone. Research how hearling loss happens, I'm not even kidding. People who are going deff can hear certian frequincy bands REALLY well and others are muffled or non existant.

 
I taught myself how to design, build, and repair computers, and I am in ITT Tech going for a Bachelor's of Science major in Information Systems Security, so I know how computers work.
If you are such a whiz kid, why are you not at MIT?

Being at ITT isn't impressive.

Also, you need to read up on Autism and how it affects people. Do that, then I will let you laugh in my face about having supersensitive hearing.
Supersensitive compared to the deaf, maybe.

 
what is it with you and sony?

because it sounds 'just as good' to you doesn't mean it sounds the same. atrac3plus placed a priority on higher frequencies, where low bitrate mp3 encoders usually place an emphasis on midrange frequencies and end up sounding 'muddy' either way you slice it, it's an incomplete transfer, there is much material lost with either codec

if i dropped $500 on an ipod, i'd sure as shit be talking ogg up

and if i spent a bunch of money on sony products... well you already know all about that

64kbit/s atrac3plus sounds better than an mp3 of the same bitrate, it's true, but to say it sounds the same as the original cd is completely absurd

 
Well, obviously you guys obviously do not know much about ATRAC3plus. ATRAC3plus is to mp3's what CDs were to tapes. ATRAC3plus is superior to both MP3 and WMA formats. Adaptive Transform Acoustic Coding3plus, is an advanced compression technology that can compress a CD to 1/22 its normal size (63.475kbps, or about 64kbps, which is the bitrate I use). It is superior to MP3 in that it maintains higher quality at lower bitrates.

 
Heyman, I have talked to the installers at circuit city, and they said that 64kbps ATRAC3plus sounded the same as "high-bitrate mp3". The equipment I use on my home computer (where I rip, store and burn all my music) is why its hard for me to tell the difference between a store-bought CD and ATRAC3plus. The equipment is SonicStage Digital Music Manager version 4.0, the Turtle Beach Montego DDL soundcard, the Turtle Beach EarForce HPA 5.1 channel headphones, and a Monster Cable Home Theater Power Center HTS800 with Monster CleanPower Stage 1 technology, which is designed to clean up 95% of the EMI and RFI in the AC Utility lines. The Montego DDL's stats are a frequency response of 10Hz to 120kHz with 0.0247%THD and a signal-to-noise ratio of 96dB. If you want to hear what it sounds like through my equipment, you can IM me on yahoo. My Yahoo ID is mnaines22@yahoo.com

 
Well, obviously you guys obviously do not know much about ATRAC3plus. ATRAC3plus is to mp3's what CDs were to tapes. ATRAC3plus is superior to both MP3 and WMA formats. Adaptive Transform Acoustic Coding3plus, is an advanced compression technology that can compress a CD to 1/22 its normal size (63.475kbps, or about 64kbps, which is the bitrate I use). It is superior to MP3 in that it maintains higher quality at lower bitrates.
saying it is better then mp3 isnt say much and it is still compression no matter what way you look at it so information is still lost ....look at it this way

i am 6'9 say you were trying to stuff me in to a 4' box ...the only way this is possible is to remove parts of me so i can be small enough to fit in the box ...this is exactly what compression is doing even if it is a better form of compression just because you cannot tell the difference does not mean there is no difference.

 
atrac 3 is superior to mp3

atrac-3 is a perversion of sony's initial mission with the atrac encoding standard to sacrifice vast amounts of recorded data for higher compression and higher capacity, it's basically sony selling out and buying into the mp3-player hype, and naturally, they're going to tell you it's 'the bomb'

 
Well, obviously you guys obviously do not know much about ATRAC3plus. ATRAC3plus is to mp3's what CDs were to tapes. ATRAC3plus is superior to both MP3 and WMA formats. Adaptive Transform Acoustic Coding3plus, is an advanced compression technology that can compress a CD to 1/22 its normal size (63.475kbps, or about 64kbps, which is the bitrate I use). It is superior to MP3 in that it maintains higher quality at lower bitrates.

Let me help you, because now you are arguing points no one is going against.

MP3 tapes

Does this help?

 
Heyman, I have talked to the installers at circuit city,

Answer:

Go buy a capacitor. It will solve all your problems.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/uhoh.gif.c07307dd22ee7e63e22fc8e9c614d1fd.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

mnaines

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
mnaines
Joined
Location
Kansas City, KS
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
131
Views
7,295
Last reply date
Last reply from
flakko
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top