you said motorcycle vs. your cav.....not economical carWhich is more practical for the average consumer?
What is more economical then a Cavalier?
apparentlySupa's mom fo sho
How is it fair you can be vague with motorcycle but I need to be specific with which economical car?you said motorcycle vs. your cav.....not economical car
go back to other thread and read 176How is it fair you can be vague with motorcycle but I need to be specific with which economical car?
The cav IS an economical car, idiot.
If I lived close, I would or ride a bike, but 40 mins in car, that aint happenin on foot lol.I'd rather walk.....
wear winder riding gear....or just a coat...or grow some balls and quit your bitchingWhat do you do in the winter with a motorcycle?
I don't need to. I know what I said. Fact is though you are saying the bike is more practical than a car PERIOD. If an economical car is more practical than a motorcycle than the cav is more practical since it IS an economical car.go back to other thread and read 176
Did you say this? no. You said I can't call my cavalier basic transport that is economical until I buy a motorcycle.
You were the first to assume that our needs of practicality were the same.
I would wager many more people will consider my cavalier more procatical "for them" than your bike.
insert quarter and play again.