Power supply for bench testing

300 amps is a lot of current to expect out of an AC supply.

I have a 70A continuous Astron linear supply and it's a pain in the ass to move anywhere...

 
why does everyone insist on trying to find the RMS power of there amp?Clamping the amp does not give you a true RMS reading if that is what you are doing.

Besides the power supply for 300amps would be so god awful big and expensive that you would need a fork lift just to move it!Besides if you can't produce the current you need to acheive RMS in the vehicle then what good would it do to know?

 
I would be just as concerned at finding a bunch of purely resistive loads and a way to keep them cool while testing. My boss had two paint cans that are resistive loads but they're only like 15 watts or something small like that.

 
...which is why you use a purely resistive precision load...
The current is still induced by the voltage and it's the current that does the work. Phase is actually not relavant.
I was thinking back to Fryman's thread on SSA, I was thinking that was the same "logic" he was following //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
I would be just as concerned at finding a bunch of purely resistive loads and a way to keep them cool while testing. My boss had two paint cans that are resistive loads but they're only like 15 watts or something small like that.
I've built a couple 50-ohm dummy loads for RF using gallon paint cans, filled with mineral oil they're good for 2kW or so, at least for half a minute or so...I'd assume you could do the same with a low impedance load for audio.

 
I was thinking back to Fryman's thread on SSA, I was thinking that was the same "logic" he was following //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
But in typical Fryman fashion he only knew enough to not know exactly what he was talking about. HS physics FTL. Just enough knowledge to be dangerous. He assumed that since there is a phase difference between voltage and current with a reactive load, that you needed to account for that difference when figuring power applied. The problem with that logic is that if it were true, it would break Ohm's law because V would not equal I*R at any point in time. Actual power applied at any instant is not important because as I sad before, it's the current that does the work. The voltage induces the current IAW Ohm's law. That peak voltage and peak current don't occur at the same time is irrelevant. Welcome to reactive loads. Welcome to driver phase response.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Similar threads

LMAO.yep,this setup going on over 9 years.appreciate the inspirational quote although i dont take part in water boy memes.
10
871
He wants to use his receiver as a source, not as an amp, so most of your post is wrong.
23
2K
Have you tried connecting the amp to a car battery? No subs, just power. If it protects, amp is bad. If no protect, subs/wiring or ATX power...
2
1K

About this thread

ultimate157

5,000+ posts
Engineering Student
Thread starter
ultimate157
Joined
Location
Worcester, ma
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
13
Views
725
Last reply date
Last reply from
helotaxi
IMG_1154.png

GoldCountryCA

    May 5, 2024
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_1153.png

GoldCountryCA

    May 5, 2024
  • 0
  • 0

Latest topics

Top