pr's are displacement limited while ports are velocity limited
this is simply because ports dont have a suspension linear limitation, but rather a friction linear limitation, non-linear drag against the port is the catalytic for distortion for ports while non-linear suspension travel is that for passives. There is also a resonance issue with ports that tends to occur in higher frequencies. This is a bit more complex, but it can show up in impedance and frequency response measurements.
a 5"round port might be about the same as a 15" passive radiator at around 2" peak to peak. The port can do about 10" peak to peak before serious compression... yes the air in ports move just like woofers //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif So its easy to compare ports to pr's once you know how far each can move before distortion. One thing surprising about ports is that the higher they are tuned, the faster the air moves and the more drag there is.... for PR's the lower the tuning, the more they move and the more the suspension get stressed.
often times, it is difficult to get a big port in a small box. The tuning of the port depends on the length and area or the port with the volume of the box, the pr is much more heavily dependent on the mass of the pr itself, the box is pretty minor. So if you have a high BL driver and a small box, a PR is very ideal from a size perspective.