That’s another issue in my opinion. If trump shut down everything, liberals would be burning him at the stake for letting the economy tank and people becoming homeless etc. He leaves it up to the states to decide what they want to do and gets burned for not shutting everything down. Isn’t the economic downfall going to cost more lives than the actual virus? With the country we live in, you can’t tell people they can’t go to work. I understand people not wanting to go to work and getting unemployment but forcing people to not work is ridiculous. I heard Biden wants me to wear a mask anytime I’m outside of my home. He can kiss my ***. In 100 degree heat I’m pretty sure the virus doesn’t survive and there’s scientific evidence it is killed in sunlight instantly.
From what I’ve read about reinfection is that scientists still aren’t convinced and early evidence shows if it’s true, it’s very rare to have severe issues.
I think liberals are using other nations as a baseline, you might get some neoliberal hacks going after trump for doing the right thing but we'll never know because he objectively did the wrong thing relative to almost every other nation. As it turns out capitalism isn't the best system for surviving a pandemic with minimal losses.
Homelessness it's pretty clear that while Trump did address evictions, albiet too late since most of them are already underway thanks entirely to the senate, he did assign a fairly promising halt of them until the elections are over. I'd be willing to take bets on whether the freeze lasts until the pandemic is over and not just until after the elections though.
Forcing people to not work is sort of a red herring. Non-essential work is best halted if no safety precautions can be taken. I think it's a lose lose personally, the same with reopening schools. It's somewhat clearer when you compare nations around the world though. It doesn't take a genius to see how other nations are doing, compare it with our own and see an obvious failure of leadership. Governors largely are trying to halt the spread, but the republican governors are doing the worst at that, this is just objectively true in every state with a substantial density of people anywhere in the state. I'm not lining up to **** any democratic governor's dick, I think they're full of platitude and often make stupid decisions, but NY and IL had the steepest declines in cases while Florida and Texas suffer in their ignorance, that's not something you just pretend isn't the case. One party tries and the other wants to sacrifice grandma. That's unacceptable to me.
In terms of wearing masks outside, I don't think that's realistically enforceable, but if you're around other people outside it's a good thing. About the virus not surviving sunlight, well that's bullshit. What you call instant is actually minutes. Sunlight makes it safer, but Trump lied out of his *** during that whole meeting, it's something like 3 minutes in direct mid-day sunlight.
Reinfections are still a growing scientific consensus, you're right, but there have been at least 4 cases of reinfection with the same strain. The issue in this data is that people often aren't tested in a way that actually differentiates the strain. This means that the data for reinfection requires exclusively people who have been extensively studied to be reinfected, otherwise they write it off as potentially a different strain which is old news. We received reports from Wuhan that differential strains were possible routes to reinfection as early as February or March. Still, they've shown it to be possible in different labs each time. If they had the resources to study every virus strain and which specific one everyone had I trust that the data would be complete enough to definitively make that conclusion.