MikeofTulsa
Moderator
The one and Only!
unfortunatly its true.alot of us lobbied for mods. but when goob decided to make it a popularity contest, it kinda defeated the purpose. why? just as you pointed out, nothing really changed, it actually got worse. and i believe more people left AFTER mods were instituted then before.
and it's the same today. mod nominees are determind by post count. and then voted on by the general forum. so, wh0re away, make friends and viola', your a mod. yeah, real nice system there. going to really snag the people who are mature enough to be mods. though, to be honest, it has grabbed a few good ones.
again, in the end, goob doesn't care enough to really institute change. so it's up to the individual members and mods to conduct themselves in a proper manner. and with the below average maturity level here, it isn't happening. bit(h all they want, it's not a democracy here. things aren't changing until those involved want too. and why change it if you got the power? it'll always be about the clicks and efriends and nothing more, or less. toss in the routine forum boner, and you have caraudio.com.
take it or leave it.
wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif
i tried to make a difference.It's sad that the above, in its entirety, is true.It is sadder still to be able to say that with any degree of honesty.
mrray13, more or less since I became a member here I have been lobbying for across-the-board, fair (no favoritism) enforcement of the rules.
Everytime I see someone get bounced for this reason or that while other, seemingly more popular [with the right people at any rate] members are allowed to do the exact same thing that someone else just caught a vacation for I will usually pitch a small fit and argue that what's good for the goose should as well be good for the gander.
Oddly it seems I'm the only one that ever sees it that way.
Nobody cares about the rules until they become a convenient mechanism to get rid of someone who has made themselves unwelcome. Outside of that? Those that continually crow (when it becomes convenient to do so) about TOS violations clearly demonstrate regularly that they do not care in the least about such things at the end of the day.
I think the irrefutable hypocrisy in that is both astounding in its scope and somewhat insane that it regularly gets defended!
I've come to the conclusion that it simply isn't going to happen regardless of how much I may wish it would or believe that it should.
It isn't going to deter me from trying every once in awhile but I'm not holding my breath that any degree of real change will be instituted here. Those that have the power see no real issues with the status quo and as long as that is the case the status quo will continue to be maintained. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif
C'est la vie, I suppose...
i fear this is truegoob wouldnt even read this thread unless it was effecting his click count //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
thats not entirely true, i care somewhat, not like i used to tho. you can thank all the drama for that.ya know, you could of saved yourself some time in typing that by just posting "the mods dont give a ****":laugh:
