Interesting stuff to think about but I think it is controlled by the bad guys. I mean Art Bell himself is a freemason. I believe the purpose behind his show is to put real conspiracies with off the wall ones, in an effort to discredit them all.
So that anyone who believes anything other than what the government or mainstream media says is labeled a tin foil hat wearing nutbag.
On top of that, doesn't FOX own coast to coast? That alone would make me believe I'd never get anything of real value or truth from it.
Well, I guess I'll partially get involved with this thread since I already spoke up.
You know, you and I think a lot alike in a lot of ways. Yes, just about everything to some degree is controlled by the powers that be and I too even have to accept the possibility that CtoC is also owned and controlled by "them." Especially when your talking about big $$$$. Although I believe Art Bell owns his own radio show and station. He has a massive tower in his home town in Nevada and broadcasts from there and in LA where George now hosts the show. There guests are mostly all credible, and the information is researched to the best of "their" abilty when they present their work.
This to, is anther facet of the
Hegalian Dialectic. Look it up and start to see the picture guys if you haven't heard anything about this.
One thing you have to think about, and it took me years to come to this conclusion, is that when you start to delve into this type of information, it typically results into a shit throwing argument for many reasons: People don't want to think about it, the ever so popular "conspiracy theory" cop-out, and some may agree completely about what is real and fabricated.
This subject ties in with religion and poloics (espically because it combines the two) and most always leads to some kind of change: sometimes negative, sometimes positive.
I'm not going to turn this into a thesis, but when you get into some of this information it changes you in ways you may not be ready to accept whether you believe what you're getting into or not to be true. It spawns thought and wonder. Noam Chomsky put it best when I heard him in an interview talking about how most of the American public is well aware of the lies the media feeds us, but it is our
personal, responsibility to seek out the truth, which IS available if you can work you way through the barriers. This is where most uneducated people fail, and our country might be a different place if people considered the exponential consequences of every decision they make; all the way from the orgin or creation of whatever product they buy, to the end result of it's being.
Just like in car audio for an analogy, if you buy a sub and amp and create rattling that makes your car fall apart, that's an oppertunity cost you have to choose to accept in order to fullfill your wants. You got your fix for bass, but now your car is coming to pieces.
To me, a lot of this knowledge provides what I call a "defensive mechanism" for what to avoid and to thwart you to search and question what you are told on every level. If you know "this" is not right or real you can use that belief or piece of knowledge to avoid the consequences of following the herd. You can't always convince people on your beliefs, and playing the political game, as you so clearly articulated, just gets you put in the tin foil section, unless you have major $$$ to go public with your ideas and can gain some "friends."
