North American Union? F*ck that

[richierich75 10+ year member]

I know what the fvcker says, I don't have to watch the video. What I don't know is why you wont answer my question -- when were the explosives set?

No you obviously don't know what the fvcker says and I think you really do need to watch the video. How the fvck do I know when the explosives were set

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

thanks

Now, do you think that you can calmly explain:

1. Precisely what is so suspicious about the leaseholder of the WTC purchasing insurance?

2. How it is this that you conclude that most insurance policies exclude damage to skyscrapers due to plane crashes?

3. Why you say that planes do not fly over cities?

4. When the explosives were set?

5. Why the need to set explosives when you went to all the trouble of having commercial jets smash into the buildings?

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

No you obviously don't know what the fvcker says and I think you really do need to watch the video. How the fvck do I know when the explosives were set

Well, you act like you know everything else.

 

[richierich75 10+ year member]

But, but .. somewhere near the end the leaseholder of the buildings can be heard saying, "pull it." We all know that when a jewish landlord says "pull it" to a fire officer that it is understood to mean, "set the explosives and blow the fvking building down."

No WSW, it is an interview he did - not just an audio clip

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

No WSW, it is an interview he did - not just an audio clip

Oh. Well, then he definitely was in on it.

 

[richierich75 10+ year member]

Now, do you think that you can calmly explain:

1. Precisely what is so suspicious about the leaseholder of the WTC purchasing insurance?

2. How it is this that you conclude that most insurance policies exclude damage to skyscrapers due to plane crashes?

3. Why you say that planes do not fly over cities?

4. When the explosives were set?

5. Why the need to set explosives when you went to all the trouble of having commercial jets smash into the buildings?

Precisely are very strange coincidence.

Planes do fly over cities, not at that height over NEW YORK CITY

The explosives were set when the decided to pull the building

That would be a good question to ask him

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

Precisely are very strange coincidence.
Planes do fly over cities, not at that height over NEW YORK CITY

The explosives were set when the decided to pull the building

That would be a good question to ask him

Hah, calling you guys conspiracy "theorists" is a gross overstatement. You bishes don't even have a theory.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

Hah, calling you guys conspiracy "theorists" is a gross overstatement. You bishes don't even have a theory.

theories require intellect and an ability to gather at least some facts.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

They attempt but can't - what happens when they lower the fed interest rate? The market rises, guess that's not cause and effect controlled by the gov't.
The gov't doesn't really want a recession - of course they do, how else are they going to get the Amero in circulation - bring the dollar down and rise with the Amero.

They lowered the hell out of the interest rate and guess what...we are still in a recession.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

Precisely are very strange coincidence.
Planes do fly over cities, not at that height over NEW YORK CITY

The explosives were set when the decided to pull the building

That would be a good question to ask him

They do not land in NYC?

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

don't tell me another one of these 911 conspiracy idiots is spouting off dumb shit.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

They do not land in NYC?

Flip, he hasn't thought any of this out -- at all. Ironically, both of these guys are guilty of the very thing that they accuse the rest of the nation of doing -- not thinking for themselves.

They just get caught up in these video clips and they never bother to really think for themselves. The bottom line is that they get their rocks off on these theories so they will not question them.

You may be to young to remember the show, "In Search Of." Each episode they would "investigate" something like bigfoot or the Lach Ness monster. It was very popular because that sort of thing appeals to people for some reason. It's the same thing here.

 

[Flipx99 5,000+ posts]

It just seems very intuitive that planes would land there. I think there is even an airport called Laguardia or something.

You know what I thought when I first heard. I was a principal's aid and said "Some jackass done flew a plane into a building." I thought it was a drunk/misguided pilot. I didn't really feel bad when I found out it was terroists.

But what makes me LOL more than anything is the people who said the shit at the Pentagon was faked, yet have never stepped foot there. We had a guy show us around where it and where they were rebuilding it.

I think this is some type of accelerationist fantasy...one clue leads to another just as one stroke into wet ****** leads to another...I imagine it's like that.

 

[azimuth 5,000+ posts]

Flip, he hasn't thought any of this out -- at all. Ironically, both of these guys are guilty of the very thing that they accuse the rest of the nation of doing -- not thinking for themselves.
They just get caught up in these video clips and they never bother to really think for themselves. The bottom line is that they get their rocks off on these theories so they will not question them.

You may be to young to remember the show, "In Search Of." Each episode they would "investigate" something like bigfoot or the Lach Ness monster. It was very popular because that sort of thing appeals to people for some reason. It's the same thing here.

i watched ghost hunters international the other night..........and people still believe in hauntings.