North American Union? F*ck that

That's funny you keep bringing my race into it because there were a couple times when you were talking about "women and alcohol" that I could have brought your race into it, but thought better of it.
Hah, you can bring my race into it -- I don't mind one bit (you would not mind either if you were me).

I just find it funny that you even mention it since you have been carrying on about jews like you have.

 
Hah, you can bring my race into it -- I don't mind one bit (you would not mind either if you were me).
I just find it funny that you even mention it since you have been carrying on about jews like you have.
No doubt man, I'm kind of leary about a person that calls out a group of people like that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif

 
Are you stupid? It's ALL valid to the entire picture.
It's strange that 6 weeks after someone buys the twin towers, bombs are exploded into it.

It's strange that someone gets a special clause into the insurance that ends up paying out over 800 million.

Until you do the research and see the entire picture, you won't understand and that's fine. The people behind it all are counting on you to only care about what happens in your immediate life before you give a crap about anything political. As long as you get your beer and women you're fine, that's what they want, and if it keeps you happy then **** it. Sooner or later though, as the dollar keeps dropping and you have a problem paying rent or having money for basic necessities it will affect your immediate life, but by then you might not have the free time to actually do anything to change it.

And that's what they count on.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif I guess that is the only way that you can react -- you put yourself in a box with that whole "ZOMG -- he had insurance" sh!t. There really is no way to defend that statement.

Don't be pissed at me, be pissed at the guys you are parroting. They are the ones who left you hanging on that one buddy.

 
The Jews aren't a race good sir, they are a religion that has been made into a race because of their hatred of people outside their religion. It is against their religion to breed with those outside of their religion, so in essence, their religion has turned them into a race. Their racism alone should set most people into wondering about them, but I get called a racist for questioning their racism? That's funny to me, and shows how thick the brainwashing really is.
You truly are one step away from locking yourself in a cabin in Montana aren't you?

 
That's funny you think I'm parrotting someone else, as if putting 2 and 2 together is so hard of a thing to do. My beliefs are actually different than most conspiracy theorists (note the jews) but whatever, keep thinking whatever you want, you will anyways. I'm not here to educate you, as that's not even possible since you won't even look at evidence. I'm just here to discuss and debate and hopefully someone reading actually gives enough of a crap to look up something for themselves.
See that's where we differ. I don't want people to just believe me, I'd rather than not believe me and then take the time out to research for themselves the truth. It's the only real way to learn the truth...
That's not the only way we differ.

I still can't believe that you will not admit that the purchase of insurance is a non issue. Instead, it is exactly what you would expect an owner of a building to have done.

 
Question about the insurance:

1) How much did he pay for the buildings?

2) How did he pay for the buildings?

3) How much was the insurance policy?

Answer those questions and one can easily determine whether or not he even made money on the deal.

 
Insider knowledge, of course. That's how these people make money. Lots of CIA agents made money on the 911 attacks too. They placed bets (what's it called when you predict a stock is going to fall?) that the airline stocks would fall, and made a ton of money.
But of course I'm sure they all have a good reason on how they were able to predict it without actually knowing the people behind it...

He predicted it using binomial distributions. So he is was in on Hurricane Katrina as well?

 
I wouldn't even know where to begin...

And even then I am not sure I could trust the source.

You seem to have much time on your hands for that type of research. In the meantime, I will finish this 12 pack of coors light until my gf (the one in my avatar) comes home and we have great ***.

 
My question is why our government needs to spend 4 billion dollars on war and guns? don't we have a say on where our money goes that they TAKE from us? isn't this OUR country? We have a right to chose where the money is used? rather then spending all this money on new weapons why not pay off our 8 TRILLION dollar debt we owe?

Flip WHEN DO you think we'll pay off our DEBT?

I'm predict this for the election, remember this if you can. Obama is going to stay ahead in the beginning, then Mccain is going to pull through.

 
Purchase of insurance is exactly what is expected after purchasing property like that. But adding an "acts of terror" clause that pays out for "each act of terror" is definately understandable, but considering the acts of terror that came just a few weeks later and allowed him to collect double the normal amount (because each plane was considered an individual act of terror) allows me to believe there's something fishy there.
Like I said, it could seem like coincidence, but once you see the entire picture, it makes you start to wonder. At least it does to me.
Okay, but really when you break it down there is nothing there:

1. No one buys insurance bfore they have an insurable interest

--- In fact, you could not even if you wanted to. If I could insure your house against loss then I would have too much incentive to burn that puppy down.

2. Adding a terrorism clause for "each incident" is completely understandable.

------ You said so yourself.

So now you are just left with the fact that he bought the building only weeks before the incident. Am I right?

I don't understand what you are talking about when you say that he recovered twice as much.

I dont mean to be a d!ck here, but it sounds like you really are not that familiar with insurance policies.

It sounds like from what you have said that the insurance company was wanting to use the "per incident" clause as a defense and the court rejected that and said that the owner could collect the miniminum of either: two incidents or the aggregate limits. This is all very routine.

 
1. They invented these things called elections. When people chose different people, then perhaps things will change. I have my own view on why more capable people are not in government, and how to fix it...but many people (including wsw?) disagrees with me.

It mainly involves giving them more money and staying the fvck out of their private lives. I could care less whether or not the governor rents hookers as long as he is otherwise providing for the general welfare. No one I know wants to be President. We can achieve more social welfare improvements through the less restrictive private sector.

2. Never. Most businesses stay perpetually in debt. I will stay perpetually in debt. You will stay perpetually in debt, probably. Most people do and that is reflected in our current debt problem. I would like to cut spending on various projects (including iraq, welfare, medicare, etc) and reduce our debts.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

LouDEnougH?

10+ year member
Taste The Rainbow
Thread starter
LouDEnougH?
Joined
Location
Buffalo, NY
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
495
Views
8,452
Last reply date
Last reply from
60ndown
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top