Isn't the A2 a 2 channel amp? If so, you would lose anything resembling a stereo image by running a mono bridged channel to power all of your front stage. The other problem is that you won't need nearly that much power up front.ok i know runnin a amp at 4ohm or say at 1ohm ur Thd is going to be better at 4ohm but if i run say the a2 at 2ohm bridged on a 6.3 set which will yield 450watts for the set would i be able to tell the lack of Thd runnin at 2ohm compared to 4ohm
put the mid and tweet both in the kick imo.i dont think i can get the mids on the dash without some serious cutting would it screw the soundstage up if i did 6's in doors midrange in kick and tweet in a-piller
well, if you really cant get them on the dash then put them near eachother. it prolly would cause some odd shit if you had them that far away. but seriously see if you can get them on the dash, it raises the soundstage like woah.i dont think i can get the mids on the dash without some serious cutting would it screw the soundstage up if i did 6's in doors midrange in kick and tweet in a-piller
More power isn't always the answer. Stereo sound requires two discrete channels to work. If you run that amp in mono you have totally defeated the purpose of "stereo" and you will only get about another dB or two out of the top end, which you will never use. You don't need nearly that kind of power on a front stage and definitely not at the expense of your stereo imaging. For a "dealer" you really don't seem to know much about how this is done.ok just that the a2 is bout 150-200 bucks cheaper and the a2 does more power in my application. If i run the a3 i will only get 150x2