new mtx's better than w7 ?

[blade44 10+ year member]

i really think that mtx is never going to become a more entry level company, and even though their new line of subs is better than their old line, they are too far behind to ever catch up. These subs are fine for trunk rattling punks who want to make a name for themselves in their small town, but they will never be taken seriously by any competitor. Spl, Sq or show car competitors will never even think of buying mtx gear because its simply not competition quality.

 

[carpartmaniac 10+ year member]

I have the MTX 9500 15", and it kills 2 10" W7 , just one 15"

 

[zebo 10+ year member]

I have the MTX 9500 15", and it kills 2 10" W7 , just one 15"

wow, thats impressive, especially considering your 15 has a higher Sd than the two w7's combined...not to mention more stroke too.

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

I have the MTX 9500 15", and it kills 2 10" W7 , just one 15"

Impresive? no.

Install and opinion factor the "kill" of yours.

 

[audiolife 5,000+ posts]

i really think that mtx is never going to become a more entry level company, and even though their new line of subs is better than their old line, they are too far behind to ever catch up. These subs are fine for trunk rattling punks who want to make a name for themselves in their small town, but they will never be taken seriously by any competitor. Spl, Sq or show car competitors will never even think of buying mtx gear because its simply not competition quality.

i dunno man people said this 8 years ago too then team thunderforce owned. they won with what some people called junk.....if you know how to use it matters more than specs anyday.

 

[Echo42987 10+ year member]

I have the MTX 9500 15", and it kills 2 10" W7 , just one 15"

Thats just so fricking stupid to even say. Two completely different sizes and two sizes made for two different kinds of bass/sound. You can’t compare 2 10’s to one 15 overall the 15 would win, almost with the majority of some 15’s. 15’s capable to hitting way harder then a 10 ever would…that’s why they make 15’s!!!!

 

[zebo 10+ year member]

Impresive? no.
Install and opinion factor the "kill" of yours.

If you were referring to my comment about it being “impressive”, then I think you missed the fact that I was being sarcastic…

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Thats just so fricking stupid to even say. Two completely different sizes and two sizes made for two different kinds of bass/sound. You can’t compare 2 10’s to one 15 overall the 15 would win, almost with the majority of some 15’s. 15’s capable to hitting way harder then a 10 ever would…that’s why they make 15’s!!!!

Not true. who was it that hit like 163db with one 10?? I forgot the specifics.

That statement is all wrong.

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

If you were referring to my comment about it being “impressive”, then I think you missed the fact that I was being sarcastic…

Nope. Just telling him it was not impressive. Don't worry not everyone is talkin about you.

 

[zebo 10+ year member]

Two completely different sizes and two sizes made for two different kinds of bass/sound

huh?

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

huh?

I think he's tryin to say 10's sound cleaner and 15's are slower.

Which is why I stated his entire statment as false.

 

[WMStateChamp18 10+ year member]

where can i get a 9512 from and how much would it run cause i have looked at them before??

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

where can i get a 9512 from and how much would it run cause i have looked at them before??

Stop thread jacking...

 

[zebo 10+ year member]

I think he's tryin to say 10's sound cleaner and 15's are slower.
Which is why I stated his entire statment as false.

I kindof thought that was what he was getting at...ignorant statement.

 

[squeak9798 5,000+ posts]

Not true. who was it that hit like 163db with one 10?? I forgot the specifics.
That statement is all wrong.

It was Nate Munson and he hit 169.x db with a single DD 9510