MTX with square subs now

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

I dont understand suggesting subs for SQ, especially since every time I do an RTA event I have to turn my subs off just to get a flat reading and score well on the meter.

With that reality in hand, I could have some funky pup's as subs and a $3000 front end stage setup and win SQ events like crazy. Then people would be like "man them funky pups are awesome SQ subs, look at how many SQ events snoopdan has won" //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

Maybe I should do some shit like that in one of my other cars to prove a point ? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/uhoh.gif.c07307dd22ee7e63e22fc8e9c614d1fd.gif

 

[Polecat 5,000+ posts]

SQ subs IMHO need NO Xmax and low power handling, so when 99% of people come on asking for SQ subs, and they have 3000 watts and want a HUGE ported, low freq. box, they are NOT looking for SQ. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

SQ subs IMHO need NO Xmax and low power handling, so when 99% of people come on asking for SQ subs, and they have 3000 watts and want a HUGE ported, low freq. box, they are NOT looking for SQ. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

try convincing the kiddos of that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[Polecat 5,000+ posts]

try convincing the kiddos of that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

I've been trying for years too //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[bball09124 10+ year member]

FINALLY!

yes! i have been waiting for mtx to release some good sq subs, i can't wait to get my hands on some.

just kidding

 

[Beefy 10+ year member]

Ill stick with the Kickers

 

[BringDaBoom 10+ year member]

Ill stick with the Kickers

Nice lookin Navigator mang //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/thumbsup.gif.3287b36ca96645a13a43aff531f37f02.gif

 

[Blinkdogo2 10+ year member]

mtx is ****n retarded, they are stealing kickers idea and makking it even worse if i were kicker id be mad for ruining even further the use of a square sub.

l5's are the best kicker has then as it goes up the l7 is a lil worse cuz of the large drop in sq, then the solox's **** balls cuz they have no excursion

 

[MyFartsStink 10+ year member]

**** mtx. No offence to their amps though

 

[Polecat 5,000+ posts]

mtx is ****n retarded, they are stealing kickers idea and makking it even worse if i were kicker id be mad for ruining even further the use of a square sub. l5's are the best kicker has then as it goes up the l7 is a lil worse cuz of the large drop in sq, then the solox's **** balls cuz they have no excursion

I think your a mistaken.....

question for you...

being the L5, which you say is our best, has the same cone similarities, shape,etc, why does the L5 have superior SQ over the L7??//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif

Solo x's are quite, because they have no 'excursion'??//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

have you ever seen one, or used one, or used a CV stroker??//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eek.gif.771b7a90cf45cabdc554ff1121c21c4a.gif

do you even know HOW Xmax, or 'excursion' is derived??//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[Louisiana_CRX 5,000+ posts]

When is Kicker going with a font like that on the Solo's //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif

 

[Blinkdogo2 10+ year member]

im saying from personal experience the l5 sounds better, most likely because it was a dif set up then the l7 but also the l7 is def geered for higher output and on the square cones the edges flex and distort easily and moer amplitude with an l7 would cause more flex distortion, also every youtube video u see with solo x's they have little excursion, im not set on this idea,,

what i mean is if u can show me a vid where a solo x has good excursion then i will believe u,

 

[Blinkdogo2 10+ year member]

comps suuck horribly and the new comp vr's realy ****

 

[WrenchGuy 10+ year member]

Who cares? What about all the round ones?

 

[Polecat 5,000+ posts]

im saying from personal experience the l5 sounds better, most likely because it was a dif set up then the l7 but also the l7 is def geered for higher output and on the square cones the edges flex and distort easily and moer amplitude with an l7 would cause more flex distortion, also every youtube video u see with solo x's they have little excursion, im not set on this idea,,what i mean is if u can show me a vid where a solo x has good excursion then i will believe u,

so you've heard a few 'homies' installs, now your a profession advise giver...NICE.
Ok, what IS the difference between the L5 and L7, that might make it a better SQ woofer?

so you believe all the corner problems started back from 2000, yet we don't see corner problems....NICE.

So you HAVE to have 25mm-30mm of Xmax to get loud?? NICE

you can quit this test at any time.......................