i wondered the same thing.*Crazy idea #1274*
If I line the INSIDE of my enclosure with sound deadener, what kind of change would I notice?
what if its fiberglass //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gifand no i havent done it. but why dampen something that already dampens itself?
what if its fiberglass //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Molding clay. People use it all the time to kill the resonances of their 'glass kickpanels.what if its fiberglass //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
I think you are misinterpreting what was said in THIS LINK. The incident wave (the red wave) isn't the sound coming from the back of the box, it is the sound radiating rearward from the speaker.I asked, because sound going from the back of the box can cancel out sound from the speaker, it's why the sound better facing backwards than forwards. (someone tested this, I found the link on one of the old threads)
There are benefits in having a sturdy box (which is why we use .75" or greater MDF), but you'd have better resonant killing properties by layering up the MDF (making the walls twice as thick with the MDF) than trying to layer on sound deadening IMO. You don't want the box to flex, that's a given, and can achieved either by using internal bracing or, as I mentioned, doubling the thickness of the walls of the enclosure.So, if I were to line that, super-deaden it, there'd be less vibration from the back of the box to interupt the vibration from the speaker. Means (potentially) clearer, richer, deeper bass.