L7 or 13w3v3

[dman4486 5,000+ posts]

you just agreed that 3k is possible on an L7.....

http://forum.realmofexcursion.com/showthread.php?p=270440

top post is 1500w/ sub

now the so called proof that the w3 could do 2k is bs.....there is nothing saying that it was 10krms total. for all you and your infinite knowledge know, it was 10k peak witch may equate to 5k real rms. and divide that by how many drivers?

you sir are fighting the uphill battle

 

[endofdays89 5,000+ posts]

JL subs are not meant to get loud, they are for SQ, the W3 will not ever be as loud as an L7, why is this even being debated here retards?

and did i just see w3 and 2k in the same sentence?

 

[dman4486 5,000+ posts]

JL subs are not meant to get loud, they are for SQ, the W3 will not ever be as loud as an L7, why is this even being debated here retards?
and did i just see w3 and 2k in the same sentence?

even the guy that is ALWAYS WRONG gets it:wow:

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

anyway stop arguing with me and argue with 171.7db's 1n effin 1994 with 5 subs rated for a total of 2,000 watts rated power handling running at 10,000 watts... thats 5x the specs...

what were they? OH! W3's!

and are the W3's stronger than the W3v3's ...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif don't think so

lets see some recorded numbers of what the L7's have taken in power handling

mull that over... i'll be back in a minute my little fledglings

 

[dman4486 5,000+ posts]

JL subs are not meant to get loud, they are for SQ, the W3 will not ever be as loud as an L7, why is this even being debated here retards?
and did i just see w3 and 2k in the same sentence?

I believe it was post 94 if you are curious

 

[dman4486 5,000+ posts]

anyway stop arguing with me and argue with 171.7db's 1n effin 1994 with 5 subs rated for a total of 2,000 watts rated power handling running at 10,000 watts... thats 5x the specs...


what were they? OH! W3's!

and are the W3's stronger than the W3v3's ...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif don't think so

lets see some recorded numbers of what the L7's have taken in power handling

mull that over... i'll be back in a minute my little fledglings

you didn't even make a point....running at 10k peak???????

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

you just agreed that 3k is possible on an L7.....
http://forum.realmofexcursion.com/showthread.php?p=270440

top post is 1500w/ sub

now the so called proof that the w3 could do 2k is bs.....there is nothing saying that it was 10krms total. for all you and your infinite knowledge know, it was 10k peak witch may equate to 5k real rms. and divide that by how many drivers?

you sir are fighting the uphill battle

I'm pretty sure it would be hard to squeeze 171.7 db out of less than 10,000k but i'll let you be the judge of than since you are so wise...

for your arguement's sake I hope they didn't put out 171.7 on 1k a peice, cause the new W3's can DEF. take that, and that sounds pretty loud...

maybe louder than the L7!?!?!

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

JL subs are not meant to get loud, they are for SQ, the W3 will not ever be as loud as an L7, why is this even being debated here retards?
and did i just see w3 and 2k in the same sentence?

I believe it was post 94 if you are curious

Got anything else stupid to say?

 

[endofdays89 5,000+ posts]

I would definitely agree if you said that the w6v2 was ment to be more of a step up in SQ than SPL... but i would actually probably go with the w3's over the w6's trying to achieve pure SPL... the W6v2 doesn't operate well at all near its mechanical limits. the surrounds are flimsy and tear easily in my experience with W6's i have found almost all of them will tear the surrounds before they burn the motor... and don't let just anyone design the enclosure for the w6v2.
Alot of high spl has to do with pushing the subs a bit farther than they were ment to go, this is not good at all for the w6v2's....

The new w3 though are actually like the w6v1's on steriods. and no more sh!tty surrounds

that is about to be sigged, Are you really as dumb as that bold statement above?

 

[dman4486 5,000+ posts]

Got anything else stupid to say?

what is stupid? other than you claiming that a w3 can keep up in power handling and output with an L7?

 

[dman4486 5,000+ posts]

in all reality the only comparison that can be made between the two brands is the w3 vs the L5 and the w7 vs the L7.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

what is stupid? other than you claiming that a w3 can keep up in power handling and output with an L7?

I've given you all the proof you need, now you just look ignorant.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[dman4486 5,000+ posts]

I've given you all the proof you need, now you just look ignorant.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

where is the proof that a w3 can compare to the L7? and show me the w3 can compare to the L7 in a daily setup like your original question....you have proven nothing

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

that is about to be sigged, Are you really as dumb as that bold statement above?

hmmm well no... considering higher numbers have been acheived with W3's

try to wrap your tiny head around this... the W6v2 was designed to operate within certain smaller parameters, while the W3 is far more flexible despite its intended purpose and rated power being lower.

for example... get near the X-max of the W6v2, what do you get? ...a cone-less w6

this is because the w6 has a ligher, yet weaker cone assembly which more finely tuned and acceptable if the recomended specs are followed...

the W3's however are much more versatile because they are designed to be more (you-proof) with rubber surrounds that wont freakin break at 2x the X-max (exadgeration)... this is only one of many examples that illustrate this fact...

not to mention the w6 is only "rated" for 150 more watts than the w3

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

where is the proof that a w3 can compare to the L7? and show me the w3 can compare to the L7 in a daily setup like your original question....you have proven nothing

neither have you nim-rod... i've given you more proof than you've given me...

2k on an old w3 speaks quite loudly... show me 2k on an L7 someone?