Never looked into doing t-lines just know there's more involved in design and they're bigger. I'm thinking he probably has an suv. But yeah that's got some width and depth to it lol.
Never looked into doing t-lines just know there's more involved in design and they're bigger. I'm thinking he probably has an suv. But yeah that's got some width and depth to it lol.
Do they usually work better tuned a little higher then you'd normally tune for sq ported? if I had somewhere to put a t-line wouldn't mind trying one 1 day just for fun.Lowering the tune will make it even bigger... lol... I wonder how a 37hz tune with that driver will do extension wise?
Yeah i know what you're saying. I'm learning too. Have modeled some drivers like that before. Some Daytons come to mind. Kinda the same way. Go larger box to get better low end extension then looses power handling. Sounds like he may want to go with something else if he wants to kill the lows.I modeled it up vented and I did not like it... that said, I like a low tune and to be able to use all the power rating when vented but maybe you'll see something different. It just did not like a low tune in a vented box as the excursion kept being a problem. Maybe I looked at it all wrong but for anywhere near rated power it needs a smallish enclosure, and that looks like to me that kills the low end.
I'm still learning but maybe a sealed box or lower power would be better if going ported.
I sorta gave up... It just lost too much for me... that's why I looked at the qts and qms and decided to try a T-line. Everyone says with even a 40hz tune a tline will extend almost a full octave lower... cleanlyYeah i know what you're saying. I'm learning too. Have modeled some drivers like that before. Some Daytons come to mind. Kinda the same way. Go larger box to get better low end extension then looses power handling. Sounds like he may want to go with something else if he wants to kill the lows.
Where did it start dropping off in the small box?
Wonder if he has room for something like thatI sorta gave up... It just lost too much for me... that's why I looked at the qts and qms and decided to try a T-line. Everyone says with even a 40hz tune a tline will extend almost a full octave lower... cleanly
I still gotta get off my rear and build what I got planned just to see, but it's Az and hot atm... this winter I'll be doin' it for sure
I'll have to read that some time at home. A little too much to read while working lol. But I'll check it out.I'm probably gonna use a Sa-E12 for mine... read this to see if those type R 8's will work...
https://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/1828-quarter-wave-t-line-tutorial-updated/
Lotsa info online, almost too much to absorb... I found this article helpful
That's not much bigger than the 1 for the morel you mocked up.
I doubt you're dumb man. Didn't see it but what I imagine it looked like it rolled off early in the lower frequencies. Idk maybe 50 hz or something. In order to get it not to you'd have to increase box air space but at the sacrifice of power handling. Wouldn't necessarily sound like crap in small box depending on what you're expecting out of it. Just wouldn't be as loud on low frequencies as something else. Or maybe use bigger box less power. But if it looks like I think it does. Single sub I'd want something else. Maybe 2 subs bigger box less power idk.I'm so dumb I don't understand anything you guys said lol. Are you saying parts express is wrong in saying it needs .69 ported@43hz? I have a 17 civic but trunk is entirely for sub box enough room for a single 10 easily. Id prefer a low tune are you saying you cant get it tuned low because it will sound like trash?
Wouldn't be tuned that high in a ported box. idk how much power you'd have to give up without looking at.trunks pretty big so I can go smaller if i use less power I have no issues using less power. How can something play lows with such a high tune crazy