Who said those mags have the credentials or expertise required to make a professional rating?
First you make an apparently erroneous statement that Sony is horrendously overrated with evidently no evidence to support it.
When I provide evidence to the contrary via objective measured results from three separate and independent sources, you proceed to attempt to discredit
all three independent and unrelated reviewers with, yet again (yet not surprisingly), zero evidence to support such a claim.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif
Do you have any evidence any of the numbers provided are wrong? Any contradicting objective measured results? No? Didn't think so.
"Wrong, sir! Wrong! Under section 37B of the contract signed by him, it states quite clearly that all offers shall become null and void if - and you can read it for yourself in this photostatic copy - "I, the undersigned, shall forfeit all rights, privileges, and licenses herein and herein contained," et cetera, et cetera..."Fax mentis incendium gloria cultum," et cetera, et cetera..."Memo bis punitor delicatum!" It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal! You stole fizzy lifting drinks. You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and sterilized, so you get nothing! You lose! Good day sir!"