Suppose woofer x requires 1 cu ft (because it makes for easier math) for a ported box, not including port volume. Assume the ports will be run externally, and the woofer will be inverted, so mounting depth is not a factor.
What would be the difference of a 'normal' shaped box roughly 10x14x18 (3/4 material) versus a long box like a 40x14x5 (same 3/4 material).
Now finally, what if the long box was wedge shaped so that it was 40x14, but one side is 3" and the other 7" (keeping the internal volume the same, just significantly changing the angle of the surface the woofer is facing)
I'd guess with box 2, the reflection off a surface so close to the woofer may cause out of phase waves trying to drive back through the cone (all boxes have this, but I'm guessing the proximity would make a difference) or, is the fact that the low fq waves are soooo big, that it doesn't matter (the wavelength of 60 hz is 5.5 feet, so logically a wall a foot away is still REALLY close in terms of size).
I'd also guess that box 3, with the sloped opposite wall may help keep any direct reflections, but may introduce weird reflections that could be better or worse.
I'd think either 2 or 3 would need more internal bracing against flex, but that could be easily added with slight outer dimensional changes, so please ignore that for the sake of this discussion.
PS, I know the answer would be easy to find out by building all three said boxes, but ain't nobody got time for that!
Please discuss!
What would be the difference of a 'normal' shaped box roughly 10x14x18 (3/4 material) versus a long box like a 40x14x5 (same 3/4 material).
Now finally, what if the long box was wedge shaped so that it was 40x14, but one side is 3" and the other 7" (keeping the internal volume the same, just significantly changing the angle of the surface the woofer is facing)
I'd guess with box 2, the reflection off a surface so close to the woofer may cause out of phase waves trying to drive back through the cone (all boxes have this, but I'm guessing the proximity would make a difference) or, is the fact that the low fq waves are soooo big, that it doesn't matter (the wavelength of 60 hz is 5.5 feet, so logically a wall a foot away is still REALLY close in terms of size).
I'd also guess that box 3, with the sloped opposite wall may help keep any direct reflections, but may introduce weird reflections that could be better or worse.
I'd think either 2 or 3 would need more internal bracing against flex, but that could be easily added with slight outer dimensional changes, so please ignore that for the sake of this discussion.
PS, I know the answer would be easy to find out by building all three said boxes, but ain't nobody got time for that!
Please discuss!
