How much would a turbo cost for my ranger?

dont do it. there are more ways to get safe power out of that motor than a turbo. same power, same money, different parts. turbo kits come along with needing a new inake in most cases as well as an exhaust, and for max gains, turbo back is the way to go, and they get expensive.
You must not know much about FI and NA performance?

Turbo kits usualy come in stages and will generaly cost less to get the same HP then if you went naturaly aspirated.

A basic kit will come with turbo, FMU or bigger injectors, charge pipes, turbo headers/manifolds, BOV, and a preset wastgate @ usualy 5-6psi. These kits are usualy ment for cars with no internal mods for boost and make 40-50hp.

stages 2+ usualy add in an intercooler, piping, AFPR/AFP, bigger turbo, manual boost controler , stand alone/reburned computer chip.

A turbo back exhaust wont cost as much as you think, all it is basicly is a straight pipe with no mufflers because a turbo is basicly a muffler and quites it alot, 3" or bigger to allow for the extra gasses expelled from the turbo. And you dont need a new intake, a port and polished stock one will be more then enough.

 
You must not know much about FI and NA performance?
Turbo kits usualy come in stages and will generaly cost less to get the same HP then if you went naturaly aspirated.

A basic kit will come with turbo, FMU or bigger injectors, charge pipes, turbo headers/manifolds, BOV, and a preset wastgate @ usualy 5-6psi. These kits are usualy ment for cars with no internal mods for boost and make 40-50hp.

stages 2+ usualy add in an intercooler, piping, AFPR/AFP, bigger turbo, manual boost controler , stand alone/reburned computer chip.

A turbo back exhaust wont cost as much as you think, all it is basicly is a straight pipe with no mufflers because a turbo is basicly a muffler and quites it alot, 3" or bigger to allow for the extra gasses expelled from the turbo. And you dont need a new intake, a port and polished stock one will be more then enough.


dont worry man i know about turbos......stage one is 5 grand for him......becase a kit is not in production. dont u think u can get a little more than 50% power from the motor with 5 grand..i SURE AS HELL hope so. a stock intake on a turbo car is retarded, it WONT do justice. 3 inch piping on anything is fvcking RETARDED. if a 590 horse GT only need 2.5 i doubt a 200 horse ranger would need more, turbo or not. my buddies are running sr20's and rb25det's in their 240's ...i know a little about turbo man. shit my brother has a mazdaspeed protoge that we work on.......i wouldnt give suggestions without having the knowledge...::rollseyes::

 
I guess you're unaware of how an engine works..?
i meant why swap one piece of crap for another?

i have built several motors including a 4.0 v6 exploder motor i mean explorer. it was a well maintained 100xxx mile explorer that my friend and i beat down a bit in a little snow chase last winter. the motor melted two pistons after 2 minutes of abuse. i hardly think this is a motor youd wanna use. they just arent well made. swap in a 5.4 lightning motor from a wreck and id say go with it.

 
3" on a turbo isn't a bad idea at all, the key is to minimise back pressure, a mustangs a little bit different because its supercharged (im assuming) and using DUAL exhaust

 
i meant why swap one piece of crap for another?i have built several motors including a 4.0 v6 exploder motor i mean explorer. it was a well maintained 100xxx mile explorer that my friend and i beat down a bit in a little snow chase last winter. the motor melted two pistons after 2 minutes of abuse. i hardly think this is a motor youd wanna use. they just arent well made. swap in a 5.4 lightning motor from a wreck and id say go with it.
Oh ok, i didn't understand what you were saying. My mistake. I met a couple of guys that put some v10's in their f150's. That would be insane to have a lightning engine in a ranger.

 
dont worry man i know about turbos......stage one is 5 grand for him......becase a kit is not in production. dont u think u can get a little more than 50% power from the motor with 5 grand..
There is a such thing as a completely CUSTOM kit, and your HP possibilities are endless for the most part.

i SURE AS HELL hope so. a stock intake on a turbo car is retarded, it WONT do justice.
What intake are you talking about first of all, an air intake? if so an intake on the end of the turbo works FINE. Or if your talking about the intake manifold, most stock ones flow pretty **** good as is. You can port and polish your stock one for a bit better flow but you dont need an aftermarket one.

3 inch piping on anything is fvcking RETARDED. if a 590 horse GT only need 2.5 i doubt a 200 horse ranger would need more, turbo or not.
Then why does my buddys 480whp probe have 3" straight pipe? Or another friends 400awhp STI have 3" turbo back? Or the Evo MR with 600awhp with a 3" turbo back...Why? Because they flow better and restrict less.

my buddies are running sr20's and rb25det's in their 240's
Ok?

...i know a little about turbo man.
I think its pretty obvious you dont.

shit my brother has a mazdaspeed protoge that we work on.......i wouldnt give suggestions without having the knowledge...::rollseyes::
Oh wow you so your brother has the most inefficient turbo'd car ever made, congrats but it still doesnt mean you know as much as you think. If mazda was trying to compete with the SRT4 or the cobalt SS they failed terribly.

 
There is a such thing as a completely CUSTOM kit, and your HP possibilities are endless for the most part.

What intake are you talking about first of all, an air intake? if so an intake on the end of the turbo works FINE. Or if your talking about the intake manifold, most stock ones flow pretty **** good as is. You can port and polish your stock one for a bit better flow but you dont need an aftermarket one.

Then why does my buddys 480whp probe have 3" straight pipe? Or another friends 400awhp STI have 3" turbo back? Or the Evo MR with 600awhp with a 3" turbo back...Why? Because they flow better and restrict less.

Ok?

I think its pretty obvious you dont.

Oh wow you so your brother has the most inefficient turbo'd car ever made, congrats but it still doesnt mean you know as much as you think. If mazda was trying to compete with the SRT4 or the cobalt SS they failed terribly.

seeing as the cobalt ss is...well supercharge....so thats a different competition than turbo cars...

the 3 inch piping on all those cars i put money on is not helping. yes u see an increase....but 2.5 would show more. its not about unrestricting air flow completely, its about freeing up the right amount : ) dual exhaust...fully built no supercharge on that GT by the way.

 
seeing as the cobalt ss is...well supercharge....so thats a different competition than turbo cars...

the 3 inch piping on all those cars i put money on is not helping. yes u see an increase....but 2.5 would show more. its not about unrestricting air flow completely, its about freeing up the right amount : ) dual exhaust...fully built no supercharge on that GT by the way.
Ummm NO. The EVO's first mod was 3" turbo back exhaust and he gained just over 12awhp and 20awtq. 2.5" was stock i belive, so yes, he gained from 3" turbo back.

Forced induction is forced induction no mater what way you look at it, even bringing that up made you look dumber then you already appeared. Wow.

http://www.cobbtuning.com/tech/exhaustdesign/

Read that and maybe youll learn something.

 
seeing as the cobalt ss is...well supercharge....so thats a different competition than turbo cars...
How is it "different" competition? It's just a different way of forced induction.

and BTW, if this idiot spends $5k putting a turbo on a 3.0 when he could get a 345 hp crate 302 from Ford for $3500, then all humanity needs to end.

 
the 3 inch piping on all those cars i put money on is not helping. yes u see an increase....but 2.5 would show more. its not about unrestricting air flow completely, its about freeing up the right amount : ) dual exhaust...fully built no supercharge on that GT by the way.

then you'd lose money

then what the hell does the size of its exhaust have to do with anything? yes dual 3 inch pipes would be to big on a N/A engine like that becuase you need a bit of back pressure or you would lose alot of torque..

 
Ok, as someone with just a BIT of turbo experience, I think I'd like to have a say..

as well on the COMPLETE CUSTOM kit you speak of......5 grand would do a BASIC custom job. t-25 turbo no hard pipes, just the basic kit to get going..........for 5 grand i can double output almost.
You have no idea what you are talking about. There are stb TT kits for the LS1 that are in the 5k range. The import world is retardedly confused over turbo kits...For 5k, a competent builder can assemble a turbo kit for any car. Hell, if I knew how to weld, I sure as hell would be running twins. Its not as hard as you think, but since you are stuck in the world of AEM intakes, and Greddy Evo2 exhausts with a front lip, you'll never see it.

seeing as the cobalt ss is...well supercharge....so thats a different competition than turbo cars...

the 3 inch piping on all those cars i put money on is not helping. yes u see an increase....but 2.5 would show more. its not about unrestricting air flow completely, its about freeing up the right amount : ) dual exhaust...fully built no supercharge on that GT by the way.
You are so ****ing retarded its amazing. The cobalt was meant to go against the SRT-4. Thats like saying the mustang isnt the camaro's competition because its 4.6 and the LS1 is 5.7... Or that the Ford GT can't compete with the Enzo because the Enzo is N/A.

And oh, BS on the 590whp GT that is N/A and only uses 2.5 piping. You are so full of shit you wouldn't even know that it is phyisically impossible to flow enough air for a 4.6 to create 590whp N/A.

2.5 would show less. If you can read a compressor map you will see that unless you have an incredibly large turbo, you need the least amount of backpressure possible after the turbo, which would be your exhaust piping. The turbo itself already creates the backpressure from the car, but you knew this,didnt you? There is a reason why every fast turbo car out there runs 3" or larger exhaust DP's. It is because you want as little restriction as possible on the turbine housing. Most people really don't need to use bigger than 3" until they start reaching 600+whp ranges.

3" on a turbo isn't a bad idea at all, the key is to minimise back pressure, a mustangs a little bit different because its supercharged (im assuming) and using DUAL exhaust
Exactly. The stang still needs as little backpressure as possible, but within reason, as it still functions as an N/A motor to a point, backpressure wise.

dont worry man i know about turbos......stage one is 5 grand for him......becase a kit is not in production. dont u think u can get a little more than 50% power from the motor with 5 grand..i SURE AS HELL hope so. a stock intake on a turbo car is retarded, it WONT do justice. 3 inch piping on anything is fvcking RETARDED. if a 590 horse GT only need 2.5 i doubt a 200 horse ranger would need more, turbo or not. my buddies are running sr20's and rb25det's in their 240's ...i know a little about turbo man. shit my brother has a mazdaspeed protoge that we work on.......i wouldnt give suggestions without having the knowledge...::rollseyes::
You don't know about turbos, you don't know about fast cars, and you need to stop going to civicnation.com

Turbo kits usualy come in stages and will generaly cost less to get the same HP then if you went naturaly aspirated.
A basic kit will come with turbo, FMU or bigger injectors, charge pipes, turbo headers/manifolds, BOV, and a preset wastgate @ usualy 5-6psi. These kits are usualy ment for cars with no internal mods for boost and make 40-50hp.

stages 2+ usualy add in an intercooler, piping, AFPR/AFP, bigger turbo, manual boost controler , stand alone/reburned computer chip.

A turbo back exhaust wont cost as much as you think, all it is basicly is a straight pipe with no mufflers because a turbo is basicly a muffler and quites it alot, 3" or bigger to allow for the extra gasses expelled from the turbo. And you dont need a new intake, a port and polished stock one will be more then enough.
Kinda sorta but not really. Only the import world works in stages... And even then, most don't do that.

Also, turbo kits add more than 40-50hp...get outta the import world man..

 
You are so full of shit you wouldn't even know that it is phyisically impossible to flow enough air for a 4.6 to create 590whp N/A.

I believe the record on a 4.6 Mustang N/A is in the 450hp range. That's with nearly $30,000 in head work and something over 9,000rpm redline. 590 is more like what a 5.4 4v ford modular is capable of, there was a guy running a 5.4 with the Ford GT block with '00 Cobra R heads and he was near 540rwhp n/a.... again with an obscene ammount of $ in custom parts and a 9,000RPM redline, strictly for drag racing.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

supraman1379

10+ year member
Lifted 03 HEMI
Thread starter
supraman1379
Joined
Location
Ocala, Fl
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
65
Views
4,588
Last reply date
Last reply from
MadLarkin
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top