help on sax 100.4

[pinoywitboom 10+ year member]

k well the question is if i get this instead of the sax 100.2, would i be able to run 1 set of components off the 100.4 bridged to 2@4ohm then in the future when i upgrade would i be able to run 2 sets of components off the 100.4? was initially going to run a 100.2 for my setup with 1 3000d but when i upgrade to another 3000d i feel 2 comp sets wired to 1 4channel amp rather than 2 2channel amps would be more budget friendly for the future? asking this cuz wasnt sure on the whole *bridging* amplifiers thing and just wanted to confirm! thx!

Click to read more...

 

[iamamp3pimp 5,000+ posts]

for the price they are at now, 2 100.2's would be much better than a 100.4

 

[ProgMtl 10+ year member]

guess it would also depend on if you have the space for extra amps

 

[pinoywitboom 10+ year member]

well thats why i would get the 4ch instead of 2 2ch, less space less wiring. was wondering if the power advantage i would be getting from 2 .2s would heavily outweigh its disadvantages in more wiring/space required than having just 1 4ch??

 

[iamamp3pimp 5,000+ posts]

i think so

 

[iamamp3pimp 5,000+ posts]

with a decent elec you can get over 1k with the pair.

with the 100.4 you are about capped near 650 ish

 

[pinoywitboom 10+ year member]

anymore suggestions?

 

[sundownz Pro Seller]

k well the question is if i get this instead of the sax 100.2, would i be able to run 1 set of components off the 100.4 bridged to 2@4ohm then in the future when i upgrade would i be able to run 2 sets of components off the 100.4? was initially going to run a 100.2 for my setup with 1 3000d but when i upgrade to another 3000d i feel 2 comp sets wired to 1 4channel amp rather than 2 2channel amps would be more budget friendly for the future? asking this cuz wasnt sure on the whole *bridging* amplifiers thing and just wanted to confirm! thx!

You can run one set now bridged on the amp to two channels, yes.

And yes, you can run two sets later using all four channels.