i understand and im not here to argue or back AP. my real point was i dont see need in making continueous post about it. we ALL know what to expect but people are still going to buy them either way. it just seems like everyone would realize its a waste of time preaching.
Well... as long as people feel the need to talk or ask about them, I will feel the need to advise against them.i understand and im not here to argue or back AP. my real point was i dont see need in making continueous post about it. we ALL know what to expect but people are still going to buy them either way. it just seems like everyone would realize its a waste of time preaching.
but while your in here, are you refering to all of audiopipes amps to do this or just the APSM's?
ok, the reason i asked is because i see these newer looking model amps floating around, they say "APCL-1500d". the case itself to looks better IMO. not saying the guts are better by any means, just the case. just curious seeing you pretty much know every amp available lol, if you had seen these.Well... as long as people feel the need to talk or ask about them, I will feel the need to advise against them.
I do not like AP in general, but the AP series ones are much better amps. But that's not saying a whole lot. The AP series ones aren't terribly efficient or clean either, but they're better than the stupid mini's.
Once again ill ask. How is that a good deal when it showed it has a very high potential to do more harm then good?im not saying they dont because ive never used skar, thats just all the "here say". as far as ap goes, no it will not do rated. honestly ive seen a clamp of one but they had a "nuclear power plant" for a electrical system>(2 350a tenny alts 6 runs knu 1/0 OFC, 10 c&d batts @ 125 ah each), and they got 1274 rms "CLEAN" from the apsm. i know this clamp means nothing because to you its here say. again i dont really like ap, yes i really think its junk, BUT i think its "junk" for a good price IMO. $125 shipped for 1274 rms to is a pretty good deal. again not everyone will get that power clean clean
---------- Post added at 11:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:59 PM ----------
i will admit that i like what skar audios equipment looks like. just alittle rich for more blood.... lol
The more its put out there the less they will get recommended and it might save somebody from buying them.i understand and im not here to argue or back AP. my real point was i dont see need in making continueous post about it. we ALL know what to expect but people are still going to buy them either way. it just seems like everyone would realize its a waste of time preaching.
but while your in here, are you refering to all of audiopipes amps to do this or just the APSM's?
Their output was about half rated, but they still do good, clean power. Not to mention they're usually cheap because they're Boss. Zed didn't make "bad" amps. Why does the rating matter if they're still solid performers? That's like saying a DD M3b is superior to a Sundown SAZ3500. They clamp roughly the same numbers, but since the DD is "rated" at 2400 and actually puts out 3800, it's a "better" amp, when in reality they're both about the same quality.Those made by ZED amps where grossly overrated. So yes they are still bad.
IMO opinion if something does not do what is says its false advertising, makes it bad IMO. A lot of people lost respect for ZED after those amps where released. Why would he even put his name on them. They are cheap now cause they are just for collectors, knowbody actually uses them.Their output was about half rated, but they still do good, clean power. Not to mention they're usually cheap because they're Boss. Zed didn't make "bad" amps. Why does the rating matter if they're still solid performers? That's like saying a DD M3b is superior to a Sundown SAZ3500. They clamp roughly the same numbers, but since the DD is "rated" at 2400 and actually puts out 3800, it's a "better" amp, when in reality they're both about the same quality.
The movie Idiocracy comes to mind every time I read one of your posts.IMO opinion if something does not do what is says its false advertising, makes it bad IMO. A lot of people lost respect for ZED after those amps where released. Why would he even put his name on them. They are cheap now cause they are just for collectors, knowbody actually uses them.Your comparison dont mean much considering they are in the same price point.
Good for you but you have never proved any of my idioc post incorrect. What does that say about you?The movie Idiocracy comes to mind every time I read one of your posts.
I'm at work doing 10 things at once, give me a break. Have you been around long enough to see the difference in our hobby from the start of these flooded overrated marketing amps?Because where would I even begin... the way you spell 'knowbody'?
I'm 38, bro. Been at this since age 12. I have seen it. Who gives a fuck if something is overrated? Find out what an amp does clean and use it accordingly, simple as that. Why get on here and make a soap opera of it?I'm at work doing 10 things at once, give me a break. Have you been around long enough to see the difference in our hobby from the start of these flooded overrated marketing amps?
well bash massive they came out with the amp first now there is 10+ of the same amp with diff names on them.
Whats funny about that too is that nobody questions the massive amps when they are essentially the same amp.
I ran the 5 channel for about 6 months and hated that POS, but the older subs were ok.I bash those nano's all the time, horrible little amps.
So you dont see how this garbage has runned anything? Not everybody knows what they really do. Just look at CL, does that not make you a bit ashamed to do what we do? Thats how the general population sees us. They dont see the talent and science that goes into itI'm 38, bro. Been at this since age 12. I have seen it. Who gives a fuck if something is overrated? Find out what an amp does clean and use it accordingly, simple as that. Why get on here and make a soap opera of it?